About Me

Name: Rajjpuut's Folly
Email: Rajjpuut@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama's Silence Defends Motley CRU Climate Gaters and Holdren

According to traditional lore, a wink is as good as a nod to a blind man . . . willfully blind Obama hasn’t noticed that global warming's royalty haven't been wearing any clothing



                  Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer and Science Czar John Holdren are running point on the CRU Climate Gate Scandal while President Barak Obama pretends “nothing has changed” in the world of supposed “global warming."  Meanwhile all the United Kingdom is in an uproar and scientists worldwide are declaiming the CRU fraud and manipulation.   Oh, and here in the United States, only Fox News is paying attention as the mainstream media continue their soulless policy of defending Leftism and its myths no matter what the cost.

Boxer who was a big fan of the NY Times spilling the beans with the Pentagon Papers is calling the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit whistle blowers “vile criminals interfering with important scientific work” and demanding their discovery and arrest.   A wink is as good as a nod to a blind man, according to ancient parables, and Barak Obama is playing the “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” game for all he’s worth all the while encouraging Boxer and Holdren to muddy the waters so that others might not see the corruption involved. The question is “Why?” 

Does the President of the United States have so much staked on the global warming myth that its continuance is demanded long enough to pass “Cap and Trade” legislation and then to pass his threatened creation of five million^^ green-tech jobs? “What exactly is going on here?” “Why?”

Boxer whose screeches proclaim loudly that “the people have a right to know” is the same Senator Boxer who  defends ACORN, Van Jones, and the motley CRU defrauders  from exposure . . . does Barbara Boxer believe the people have a right to know ONLY what’s good for her left-wing interests? 

"This is a crime. You call it 'Climate-gate.' I call it 'e-mail-theft-gate,'" Boxer said on Wednesday, suggesting if she were to hold a hearing on the matter as the ranking Republican has requested, it would include a criminal probe of the whistle-blowers who showed the world that our global warming emperors are running naked while the world actually cools . . . "Part of our looking at this will be looking at criminal activity, which could have been well coordinated," Boxer added with a sneer. The Cap and Trade legislation she’s pushing will cost $220 Billion each and ever year till the second coming and devastate the American economy, a fact Rajjpuut finds utterly criminal.

For his part: John Holdren, ever the infamous population-control alarmist and would-be bizarro proponent of any and all travesties in the name of radical reduction in the earth’s human population, testified passionately before the House Select Committee on Energy and Global Warming that human activity “beyond any reasonable doubt” is the cause of the global warming (which isn’t happening) . . . . Holdren says the matter does NOT require any more looking into, it’s all solid science.  It does seem, however, that Penn State climatologist Michael E. Mann’s fraudulent “hockey stick” analogy created from massaged and otherwise dubious data is what a real scientist would suggest needs further consideration.

The sloppily coordinated criminal and unethical activities of CRU researchers and the English and American Left’s use of the scare-tactic of global warming to ensure power and lucre keep heading leftward always       . . .  that's what surely amounts to coordinated Trans-Atlantic fraud. The victims, Americans and others subjected to laws created by manipulated, fudged and massaged data (while contrary voices and information was silenced), must be kept ignorant at all cost about . . . laws that kill world economies by diverting Trillions of dollars toward perpetuation of left-wing political control and left-wing pseudo industries’ profitability.   CRU’s efforts to “hide the recent declines” in global temperatures all played to the end of people favoring big government and left-wing programs. 

Holdren and Al Gore have several e-mails included in the CRU scandal mix. Holdren attacks the editor of a scientific magazine for suggesting that de-emphasizing the Medieval Warming Period figures would not pass the “burden of proof in a criminal case.” Holdren’s response was basically, "I’m the expert here, and what I say is what matters."

In answer to the “Why?” posed above . . . the left wants to move toward greater centralization of power into the United Nation; they are seeking to use climate-data and global warming fears to control the Third World by preventing such activities as slash and burn farming; new developments, oil drilling, etc. etc. Does this sound like a conspiracy? Perhaps it is. East Anglia was infamous for its “Piltdown Man” hoax that wasn’t uncovered for almost 40 years. Piltdown Man was a harmless intellectual prank compared to what’s at stake here and now. The Left likes to play fast and loose with “facts” that bolster their agenda while willfully decrying those who bring up real truth that threatens it. The stakes can be enormous . . . take DDT . . . .

The left became inflamed about the environment and passed laws in the ‘70’s outlawing DDT. Today two million people die every year in the Third World from malaria and five or six other tropical mosquito-borne illnesses. And the truth: DDT has NEVER been scientifically implicated in a single one of the problems that Rachel Carson’s poorly-researched and poorly-documented book claims. You can drink DDT. You can use it for salad oil. It has never been implicated in causing cancer. It has never been proven to change the DNA or other body features of any animal larger than an insect. It single-handedly saved the day during the Italian Invasion of World War II when disease threatened to wipe out the Allied Armies, the soldiers there poured it all over their bodies to kill typhus-spreading lice and no problems were ever revealed.

The two million yearly deaths from DDT’s lack in the Third World don’t tell one thirtieth the story of the misery among those who don’t die but live on . . . if the Left actually wanted to control population, rather than just saving the environment, they could have done nothing more effective than banning DDT (today a few African nations are returning to DDT and ignoring the UN ban, many more will likely do so in the future). 

If we really cared about the Third World we would keep our dollar-soaked, bloody mitts out of their business and let these people settle their own destinies their own ways whether that means peacefully or through revolution, let them be masters of their own fate and keep UN pressures through such travesties as anti-DDT laws and pro-global warming laws out of Africa and the rest of the Third World. Just so you can keep track of the bad guys intelligently, here’s one lady’s take on the top five most Unwanted:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Who_s-who-on-climate-frad-8625428-78462462.html

                Rajjpuut is glad to hear that the merry road ahead of Al Gore’s** trip toward becoming the first Global Warming Billionaire has been blown up. Remember this, his and their agenda has only vaguely been about the environment but always it’s been about money, power and control over the ordinary man.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
 
^^ which would cost 11 million real jobs in the real economy and leave us ultimately with only 500,000 permanent green-tech jobs paying between $10 and$16 per hour according to extrapolations from a similar Spanish experience
** Gore just this week cancelled a "$1,200 handshake" event where fans of the great man could listen to him talk after dinner and then get their pictures taken with Alphonse the Insipid.  Call Rajjpuut hyper-critical, but could potential flack from the Climate Gate scandal be the reason for cancelling the opportunity to have strangers near him?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

59% of Americans Say Global Warming is Rigged Science

Amazing what results one gets when cheating on an entire 500 year period, eh?  


                What a difference a few years can bring in public understanding and public feeling about crucial scientific matters . . . . Despite the unwillingness of the mainstream media to cover the unfolding “Climate Gate” story, American public opinion has shifted mightily about the validity of global warming. In late 2005, 69% of Americans regarded global warming as a huge concern and only 12% thought GW was bogus science. 
 
Rajjpuut, who’s been writing about Climate Change for almost eight years now, has been saying for several years now that any half-way educated person who saw the History Channel dvd “Little Ice Age, Big Chill” would change their mind on the matter within 90 minutes. Now it turns out, that the folks involved in the Climate Gate scandal (at the Climate Research Unit, CRU, with East Anglia University in England) were deliberately leaving out the “Medieval Warm Period”** that preceded the “Little Ice Age” when supposedly making an honest averaging of the earth’s temperature over the last 2,500 years.   Amazing what results one gets when cheating on an entire 500 year period, eh?                

               The tipping point in public opinion came early in 2009 when polls showed up to 25% of the people saying GW was nonsense and 40% of folks saying that further scientific research was needed . . . that is, despite the Left’s claim that Global Warming was finished scientific knowledge just awaiting some minor tweaking -- most people regarded it as a theory, at best. Within the last five weeks, poll after poll began to show that over half the people questioned considered global warming a subject for further study while 25% considered GW flawed science. 
 
Now as the Climate Gate scandal comes to light, 59% of Americans now agree with the statement that “Global Warming is rigged science according to a recent poll conducted by Fox News.”  While the poll results were released with the proviso “a non-scientific poll,” it’s becoming very obvious that the flim-flam artists who have been hawking global warming have lost a huge percentage of the religious fanatics who once believed in the divine revelations of Prophet Gore. 
 
                Global warming has been oft’ described as “an academic Ponzi scheme@@.” Certainly Al Gore’s steady upward charge to become the first “Green Billionaire" has been derailed, perhaps for good, and like Bernie Maddoff before him, Gore has been shown to be just another huckster. He and his family were selling this country tobacco for years and lately he’s just switched to hawking  another toxic "substance" . . . the more things change, the less they change and that a very inconvenient truth for Mr. Gore.  As with Maddoff, it’s now apparent the books were cooked; the seriously massaged and manipulated “findings” were pure BS; and the ponzi scheme only worked because a whole slew of shoddy scientists went about intimidating the real professionals in the field of scientific research. 

               Let’s hope that American legislators are now sensible enough, in the light of recent developments to unceremoniously jettison the Cap and Trade legislation now sitting in the senate awaiting debate. If enacted, Cap and Trade would cost Americans $220 Billion each and every year the law sits on the books.  As for the environmental fanatics who've used global warming as an excuse for eco-terrorism and pseudo-scientific bestsellers as an excuse to ban DDT and kill two million people yearly (via malaria and other tropical diseases) . . . if hell exists, their quasi-religious excesses may find them in an unpleasant nook of it some day soon.
 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** This was 800-1300 A.D. back in the days when Greenland really was GREEN because 97% of the glaciers were melted and the Vikings could sail the North Atlantic with impunity and discover America, before the Little Ice Age literally killed off all Viking settlements in Greenland. 

Visiting:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period, the reader will see a "reconstructed"chart of temperatures during this period from the IPCC, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which got the vast majority of its information from CRU at East Anglia University which insisted that the MWP was just a local phenomenon in the North Atlantic and thus they could rightily manipulate world temperatures for the entire period with "clear consciences."  Right . . . .

@@ and literally TRillions of dollars were at stake just here in the United States; not to mention political control of American life by less than benign government interference

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Greenfolk Deny Science Tying Climate Shifts to Sunspot Activity

                  In recent months excited astronomers, meteorologists and other scientists have tied sunspot activity, or lack thereof, to long-term climate shift. Global-warming activists aren’t buying any of that . . . can’t have real science upsetting our superstitions, can we? It’s kind of upsetting to environmentalists that the last 10-12 years have actually been cooler, well far cooler, than they expected and the culprit?

                 Lack of sunspot activity!

                Could that be true? Well, if we have a very cold winter in 2009, scientists wouldn’t be too surprised. Just this year we fell only a few days short of setting a record. After 51 days without solar flares, one came along and prevented sun observers from enjoying an occurrence that hadn’t occurred in 96 years.   The record was almost broken in 2008 as well. According to the profs, sunspots via magnetic activation of the stratosphere on planet Earth make things warmer.

                But, of course, the global-warming faithful are all about faith, not about science. When Rajjpuut mentioned this to a liberal fellow, he said, “That’s bullsh_t and you know it’s bullsh_t!” Imagine that . . . his devotion to pseudo-science is so strong that truth can’t be allowed to upset his religious services. Won’t say he was foaming at the mouth, that would be an insult to merely rabid creatures. 

                Hardly, shocking. The green-nuts grabbed hold of Rachel Carson’s lying little tome “Silent Spring” with its unsubstantiated claims and half-baked notions as if it were the original word of God. As a result DDT has been banned for about 27 years now and 54 million people have died of malaria around the globe. DDT can be drunk and/or used as salad dressing without ill effect, none too tasty, however. It has never been proven to cause harm to any vertebrate (backboned) creature. It does NOT change DNA in animals or make birds’ eggshells thinner.  But if you talk to a greenie banning DDT was the greatest success so far for their movement. Sorry to confuse Ya’all with the facts . . . idjets!

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

               

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Far Better Health Care Alternative Part XII

The single most dangerous part of the health care system is the FDA.  The single most effective sector is the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta.
 
Unlike the past when killers and cripplers like plague, typhus, typhoid, polio, small pox, anthrax were lurking everywhere . . . today’s health problems are a wave of life-style caused silent epidemics:  heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer and, of course iatrogenic incidents.
 
Today malaria kills two million people every year:  before liberals banned DDT, the most virulent acute diseases were just about wiped off the planet. 
DDT can be safely used as salad dressing or breakfast juice:  malaria has killed fifty million since Rachel Carson wrote “Silent Spring” and set off the usual liberal over-reaction but DDT is making a comeback by popular demand in Africa and other threatened areas.
 
 
 
Rajjpuut Does It Better: 

A Workable Health Care

Alternative:   Part XII
 
             Rajjpuut’s loyal readers have noticed that the ol’ boy doesn’t pull any punches.  If his thirteen part RANT series on the FDA hasn’t convinced you that the single most dangerous part of the health care system in America is the FDA, there’s probably no hope your IQ will ever rise above 50.  While the FDA is a disaster which must be cut off at the knees, the single most effective and little-used sector and even ill-used sector of the health care system in this country is the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta.  Before we talk about the CDC and how they can help us lick our intense health care mess, let’s get a bit of understanding under our belts . . . .

             Disease has traditionally been divided into two spheres since about the middle of the 20th Century:  acute infectious disease and chronic disease.  Acute infectious diseases like the famous historical killers (plague, typhus, typhoid, polio, small pox, anthrax, cholera) were lurking everywhere.  They were often diseases that thrived with lack of sanitation, personal cleanliness, and insect and animal vectors (mosquitoes, lice, fleas, ticks, rats, mice) or some that loved human crowds (small pox and polio).  With Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine in the middle 50’s it appeared that mankind had the acute diseases on the run.  Smallpox and polio were wiped off or about to be wiped off the planet and the other diseases were only capable of tiny flare ups here and there.  Sanitation, inoculation and elimination of insect vectors like the anopheles mosquito had made the world a much safer place.

             Those were the conditions when a pseudo-scientific book called “Silent Spring” was written by Rachel Carson.  The book claimed the world was in danger of a silent spring as all the birds were about to be wiped out (thinning eggshells she said caused by DDT, which she said fouled the food chain for virtually all animal life including causing cancer in humans).  The liberal over-reaction and refusal to actually “do the science” got DDT banned virtually everywhere on the planet.  Malaria which had caused 50,000 illnesses in one year has now reclaimed its top spot with two million deaths annually.  Since her book, Rachel Carson can claim fifty million deaths to her credit outdoing Hitler and Stalin combined.  However, DDT (which is so safe you can use it for a breakfast juice or salad dressing; and which has never been scientifically proven to damage any higher animal life) is making a comeback because it’s cheaper, much more effective and far less dangerous than anything used to replace it.  So hopefully within a decade we might once again be able to say that acute disease is on the run.  But here in the United States it is chronic disease and iatrogenic diseases and injuries rather than acute disease that cause all the problems.

             Most people are familiar with chronic diseases:  heart attack, stroke, diabetes, various cancers, tuberculosis, pneumonia, Alzheimer’s, influenza, and liver and kidney diseases.  These killers and automobile and other accidents account for a huge percentage of the American death toll.  If you add in “iatrogenic” incidents (where medicines and medical treatment cause death) you pretty much know all you need to know about what kills Americans.  In Africa the malaria mosquitoes do them in.  In America we do ourselves in by our lifestyles causing chronic killing diseases or by auto wrecks or by poor medical practices.  In short the biggest trouble in America is the “silent epidemic” of chronic disease that we face.  Diseases caused by how we live our lives.  In many cases Americans dig their graves with their teeth (or with cigarettes or alcohol or drugs).

             When it comes to iatrogenic diseases the AMA, the hospitals, and individual doctors and nurses do play an important and deadly role . . . but the big killer is the FDA.  You are ten times more likely to go to the hospital from a negative reaction to a prescribed medicine than you are from an automobile accident.  You are also four times more likely to die in the hospital than from an auto accident.  The roll call of dangerous drugs that the FDA has foisted off on the American people goes on and on.  We now put 30 times more children on Ritalin then we did fourteen years ago.  Ritalin has been proved in England to be totally ineffective both in the short and long-term and to have a string of vicious side-effects no one should wish upon their worst enemy.  Drugs like Avandia, Celebrex, Vioxx, all the Proton Pump Inhibitors, and Statins  are virtually loaded guns.  To top it off, none of these drugs actually cures anything.  Exit the FDA, quickly please!  And enter the CDC.
 
            The CDC is easily the most effective arm within the nation’s health care mess. By the way “mess” is a technical management term.  Everyone knows what a problem is . . . sometimes a situation has three or four or more multiple easily recognized problems.  When you have a whole slew of intertwined problems all impacting each other and the whole situation – that is a mess!  The United States has a health care mess on its hands.  Too many get sick, stay sick for a long, long time (that’s what chronic diseases or chronic situations do) and cost the system and themselves a whole helluva lot of time, trouble and an enormous amount of money.  Just as the elimination of the FDA would help enormously, the CDC is the single most little used and even ill-used part of our health care system.  In league with the National Health Facilitators, or NHFs, that in earlier blogs Rajjpuut suggested be created to help deal with our health care mess:  the CDC holds a great potential to solve our most pressing health care concerns:  chronic diseases and costs spiraling ever upward out of control.
 
            “ How?” you ask. Simple pimple.  Give the CDC Roughly twenty times its present public service announcing budget;  earmark an additional $1 billion for the nation’s public broadcasting stations and set as a national goal the reduction of deaths from chronic life-style caused deaths to 33% of the present numbers by 2025.  A worthy goal indeed.  What will be the main messages for the public broadcast stations and the CDC over private TV channels?

A.  Rajjpuut’s Seven Golden Rules of Health and the 35 extra-quality year connection**

B. Good sound nutrition based upon real science;  for example, the egg and the potato are really healthy foods when science looks at them;  dairy products are not of much use nutritionally for adults beyond say a couple slices of cheese a week for protein and a cup of yogurt daily (Born in Green Bay, Wisconsin, it pains Rajjpuut to say this but it is nutritionally sound advice); fried foods and highly processed foods are anathema to good health.  Etc.  DIETING is uniformly unhealthy practice unless it means six things:  1) in conjunction with a moderately challenging aerobic program 2) one only chooses healthy and mostly fresh foods and 3) slightly diminishes the portions being eaten 4) over 3-4 generally tiny meals  after 5) a good large breakfast 6)certain “rabbit food” such as red cabbage, carrots, etc. be allowed at any time as a snack.

C. Recognition of emergency health conditions (excessive bleeding, shock, airway blockage, lack of pulse, poisoning, drowning, severe allergic reaction, etc.)

D. Exercise and stretching do’s and don’ts and constant encouragement to get started but start slow after seeing your doctor

E. Smoking cessation info

F. Info about abuse of prescription and non-prescription drug abuse and illegal drug abuse and the dangers associated with them and where to get quitting and help info

G. Numbers for contact with the CDC and local NHFs.
 
            Basically then, the NHFs and the CDC and the public TV stations and PBS will be enlisted to carry out a crusade of reducing chronic deaths 67% in 15+ years.  To be more specific:  these people and instruments become tools for health education.  The two most important chronic conditions to eliminate are diabetes and obesity (especially morbid obesity).  We are on a crusade of disease prevention.  If you’ve read Rajjpuut’s health care blogs so far, you know that entering at stage one:  prevention is far less costly and far more effective than entering at stage four: disease treatment (which does NOT actually cure the underlying problem such as heart disease).  Right now 92% of the doctoring is concerned with stage four that needs to change immediately and we need to intervene in people’s lives positively now to ward off, undo and prevent chronic illnesses.  

            Rajjpuut once saw a fellow on a Richard Simons show who had lost 792 pounds and still looked a good fifty pounds overweight, but obviously he was working on that.  If  we start now, enormous good can be done at enormous savings.  More on diabetes and obesity in the next blog in this series.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut

** Add 35 QUALITY Years to Your Lifespan 

Interested in adding 35 years of high quality living to your lifespan? 
Here's how, and here's WOW!
 
If anything beside the spendthrifts in Washington, D.C., can derail the American Dream, it's the ever increasing cost of health care both to the nation at large and to the individual.  Roughly 72% of the price of a new American automobile is tied up in employee salary and benefits, especially health care.  In a very real sense, good health is a very personal matter . . . as the "Spider Man" movies remind us:  "With great power comes great responsibility,"  and you, the individual, certainly wield immense power in the battle for your own health, fitness, longevity and in avoiding high health care costs.
 
While working as a health educator for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas in 1977, I read about a recently-completed long-range study of vigorous older people.  The gist of it all came to this:  the University of California (Berkeley campus, I believe) extracted seven lifestyle practices that these hardy senior citizens tended to share as a group.  As for the study results, here's what those salubrious old folks had in common: 
 
The Seven Golden Rules of Health
 
1.  Eat a very large healthy breakfast daily
2.  Regularly eat 3-4 smaller meals daily
3.  Maintain a healthy normal weight
4.  Avoid tobacco and drug use (and minimize over-the-counter remedies)
5.  Drink alcohol extremely moderately
6.  Sleep 7-8 hours nightly
7.  Practice regular vigorous exercise 
 
The "magic" from the study came when UC extrapolated their finding out into the general populace.  They discovered that if they took two men, one aged 55 years old and the other 20 and compared their lifestyles . . . if the 20 year old practiced 0-1 of the "Seven Golden Rules" and the 55 year old practiced 6-7 of them:  the two men had the exact same life expectancy.  That is, it would be absolutely no surprise at all if they both dropped dead on the same day, say 28.2 years in the future.  I'm not sure what that means to you, but the 35 years difference between the two men is my personal definition of "quality of life."
 
Further studies by other groups have shown that when it comes to changes made before age 42, once the individual starts to practice the Seven Golden Rules . . . within eight years most of the harm from the prior twenty years of a dissipate lifestyle is gone.  That means, for example, quit smoking and follow the seven golden rules for eight years, and it's almost as if you've never smoked a day in your life.  Benefits from lifestyle changes after age 42, were less consistent but still quite significant.
 
A few comments are in order.  Buckling seatbelts was a fairly new idea at the time of the study.  If an eighth and ninth golden rule are needed which I would add from my experience as a health educator, they would be:
 
8.  Buckle-up in moving vehicles and always observe proper caution around machinery
9.  Avoid highly processed foods and fried foods and eat some high-fiber food daily
 
Rule #5 "Drink alcohol extremely moderately" deserves some discussion.  After a brief flirtation with boozing as a youngster, I myself rarely consume a six-pack a month these days, so that's what I practice and preach.  However, in the actual study the amount of liquor mentioned was "averaging one beer or glass of wine per day."  Over the years since the study, much has been made of the value of red wine in the diet.  All this implies that a little bit of alcohol is preferable to none at all.  If there is one area of the study that I would put in question it would be that conclusion.  Here's my "take" on the matter.  The trouble with saying that teetotalers are less healthy than extremely moderate drinkers comes in two areas:  A) a whole lot of teetotalers are reformed alcoholics who in many cases regrettably did great damage to their health prior to quitting drinking altogether and presumably shortened their probable lifespans in the process.  It is my intuition that IF the study had eliminated this effect from former alcoholics in its study, their fifth rule should have been:  "Rule #5 "Drink alcohol extremely moderately or not at all."  Additionally, from my experience I suspect that there are "overly pious personalities" out there who don't drink and resent everybody in the world who does . . . and in fact they deeply resent almost everybody in the world for any number of reasons.  If they were removed from the rolls of non-drinkers, I'm sure the non-drinkers would have averaged a longer life also.  So my last addition to the Golden Rules of Health is:
 
Rule #6 7/8  Have a sense of humor, relax
 
If on top of all this great advice, the individual, let us call him "Bill" takes charge of his own health and finds a health-conscious (rather than disease-oriented) doctor "muy simpatico" who believes that the purpose of wise medicine is to keep people hale-healthy, happy and out of his office . . .  and if Bill always seeks at least a second opinion in considering serious health care matters, then he and his doctors are part of the solution to the health care mess rather than part of problem.  If every company had a full roster of employees like Bill then health care costs and costs across the board would drop markedly starting now.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How to Refute Environmental Quackery ON THE SPOT

Enviromentalist lie and will say any ridiculous untrue thing to get their way, they do not understand real science and real science is their enemy.
DDT has been shown to be an ANTI-carcinogen in rats and never hurt a single bird or bird's egg or a single person.
The DDT BAN:  Killed 50 Million People since the publication of "Silent Spring" led to the banning of DDT. 
 
                  President Obama wants the third world to spend money on green technology, but I'm guessing the third world is getting too smart for him.  African nations seeing the wondrous effect of DDT in 2004 in stopping malaria deaths have turned their back on the U.N. DDT Ban:  in Uganda, Minister of Health Brigadier Jim Muhwezi has renewed house spraying in the most malarious areas, with the approval of the Ugandan Cabinet. Muhwezi dismissed the critics of DDT, saying, "How many people must die of malaria while these debates continue? If DDT can save lives, why not use it as we wait for the alternatives," as reported in the Kampala newspaper, New Vision, on April 27. Muhwezi also noted that the country of Mauritius was about to be declared malaria free because of its use of DDT.
 
               If the developed world wants to waste its resources on illusive green dreams, the third world knows what counts most:  human lives and the pursuit of human happiness and then you can think about liberty.  The third world doesn't have time for daydreams based upon false representations of pseudo-science.
 
Here's the rest of that African story: 
 
Here's the skinny on the exact nature of  Rachel Carson's deceptions:
 
             . . . we can only hope that Rachel Carson spends the afterlife in environmental hell with the anopheles mosquito to comfort her . . . .
 
            At the same time, the pseudo-environmentalists were going wild against DDT. Clifton Curtis of the World Wildlife Fund, for example, wrote that “DDT is so potent that as long as it is used anywhere in the world, nobody is safe”—and provided no data to back up his assertion. Dr. Gilbert L. Ross, of the American Council on Science and Health, characterized Curtis’s remarks as “typical of the dangerous environmental disinformation masquerading as science that has been stirring DDT hysteria ever since the 1960s.” Ross pointed out that “Extensive scientific studies have not found any harm to humans, even during the massive overuse of DDT in agriculture in the 1950s and 60s.” Furthermore, the scientific reports show that there is no indication of DDT use harming people, birds, bird eggshells, or other vertebrate animals.16
 
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Fall02/Mosquitoes.html   treats the book by J. Gordon Edwards, PhD. who would drink DDT on stage before every lecture attacking Rachel Carson and pseudo-scientific environmentalism.  Here's how it starts . . . .
 
 
 


Anopheles, the mosquito that carries malaria, which today kills 2 to 3 million people a year. 
(Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization )

During the war in Europe, in 1944, we went to sleep every night while being fed upon by bedbugs and fleas, and there was no way to escape them. We had also heard about “cooties” (body lice) causing typhus, which killed more than 3 million people in Europe and vicinity during and after World War I.

One day, I was ordered to dust every soldier in our company with an insecticidal powder that had just been received. For two weeks I dusted the insecticide on soldiers and civilians, breathing the fog of white dust for several hours each day. The body lice were killed, and the DDT persisted long enough to kill young lice when they emerged from the eggs.

Fortunately, no human beings have ever been harmed by DDT. I later learned that the material was produced by a German chemist, Othmar Zeidler, in 1874. He had made hundreds of chemical compounds but he never suggested uses for any of them. Sixty years later, in Switzerland in 1939, Dr. Paul Müller was seeking chemicals that might kill insect pests, and he followed Zeidler’s written directions for preparing several compounds. One of them was a compound that Zeidler had labelled dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane. Müller called it “DDT,” and in 1948, he received the Nobel Prize for his work with that chemical.

Dr. Joseph Jacobs later described his role in producing the first DDT made in the United States. At Merck & Company in New Jersey, he was assigned the task of duplicating Zeidler’s procedure, but on a much larger scale. He commandeered a huge glass-lined reactor, and produced the first 500 pounds of DDT made in the United States. An Army truck rushed it to an airport, and it was flown to Italy, where it halted a developing epidemic of typhus in our troops. The Surgeon General telegrammed thanks from President Roosevelt, and stating: “It is estimated that 5,000 lives were probably saved by destroying the typhus-carrying body lice infesting our soldiers.”1

After the war, I entered Ohio State University to study entomology. Insects are the most abundant forms of life on Earth; fortunately, only about 1 percent of them compete with human beings for food, fiber, and space. A small part of that 1 percent threatens our health with stings or bites, and a few transmit serious diseases.

I received my Ph.D. for research on beetles, and was hired to teach entomology at San Jose State University in California. There I spent much time studying parasitic insects, and taught medical entomology courses for more than 30 years. In addition to louse-borne typhus, our students were required to learn about diseases caused by mites, ticks, fleas, kissing bugs, black flies, chiggers, sand flies, eye gnats, tsetse flies, and mosquitoes.
 
At least 80 percent of human infectious diseases are arthropod-borne—transmitted by insects, mites, or ticks.2 They have caused the death of hundreds of millions of people by infecting them with the pathogens that cause typhus, bubonic plague, yellow fever, malaria, dengue fever, sleeping sickness, encephalitis, elephantiasis, leishmaniasis, and yaws. During the 1960s, the World Health Organization proposed the possible eradication of malaria, worldwide, and malaria control was achieved in areas with a population of 279 million people. Thirty-six formerly malarious countries totally eradicated the disease. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences stated in 1970:
To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT. In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million human deaths, due to malaria, that would otherwise have been inevitable. . . . 17
 
            Rajjpuut says, Environmentalists are obscene and heard.  They should adopt the Hippocratic Oath and "first do no harm!"
 
Ya'all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »