About Me

Name: Rajjpuut's Folly
Email: Rajjpuut@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama Fails to Fool All of the People All of the Time with Obamacare Bill Allowing ACORN Funding

     Two days after securing the 60 votes in the Senate needed to shove his health-care monstrosity down the throats of unwilling American voters, Barak Obama found himself with an immediate public relations nightmare. Although only 41% of American voters considered Obamacare desirable and 57% opposed it, Harry Reid and the president appear to have won the senate support necessary to obtain a 60-40 victory along party lines. This alone might have dropped the president's approval rating, but the discovery that Reid's latest offering reopens the door to ACORN funding under Obamacare appears to really be a negative for him.   It appears the backlash is immediate and angry.

     According to Rasmussen Reports Mr. Obama’s Strong Approval-Strong Disapproval rating among respondent Americans has set new lows for the second straight day. Today, Tuesday, December 22nd, among the nation’s voters only 25% strongly approved of the way Obama is performing as president while 46% strongly DISapprove giving him a presidential approval index of -21% after first hopping to a -17% rating yesterday.

      The -21% disapproval rating is the lowest yet recorded for Mr. Obama and yesterday’s -17% disapproval had been the second lowest recorded up till then. Mr. Obama who only last month showed strong approval from Black voters of roughly 80% and two weeks ago had their strong approval to the tune of 74%, now only attracts strong approval from 58% of Black voters. The disclosure yesterday that Harry Reid’s senate health care bill will allow ACORN funding was met by dismay by a large majority of Republican and unaffiliated voters.

      A majority of White voters (53%) now strongly DISapprove of his performance. Overall 52% of all men and 39% of women strongly DISapprove of Obama’s performance. Republicans (74% strongly DISapproved) overall disapproved 88%; while Democrats (47% strongly approved) showed 77% overall approval; while Independents (52% strongly DISapprove) gave Obama 62% DISapproval.

     Obama’s overall approval rating is at 43% and overall DISapproval is 56% but it is the extent of the strong DISapproval and its rapid rise in the last two days that is most shocking. These last two days have marked the first time the president’s strong DISapproval rating ever climbed above 42%, an apparent immediate backlash to Reid’s and Obama’s "public opinion be damned" tactics and the likelihood that Obamacare legislation would eventually be passed . . . and the fact that ACORN would now be eligible to play a role in Obamacare and be funded by it. The big picture is that Obama has gone from 45% strong approval with only 15% strongly disapproving in January to 46% strong DISapproval with only 25% approving today . . . opinions, especially strong opinions don't change that fast generally.

     The only shining star in Obama’s universe is that 51% of Americans still blame George W. Bush for the economic mess while 41% put the blame on Obama himself. As understanding of Obama’s and ACORN’s role in orchestrating the Cloward-Piven strategy of undermining the country with sub-prime housing loans to illegal aliens and others of questionable qualifications or obvious financial handicaps (and thus bringing on the collapse) has become better known over the last four months, Obama’s “savior” image has weakened mightily. Only lately has Obama’s overall approval rating consistently slipped below 47% and it’s now stayed there eleven days in a row.

 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Three Fools in a Tub: Obama, Geitner, and Bernanke

 
            Currently the economic ship of state is being piloted by three rub-a-dub-dub fools in a tub:  Obama, Bernanke and Geitner,  The country has nominally increased the national debt by virtually 100% since Barak Obama took office. The big lie is this:  the American people are being led to believe that’s it, that’s the sum total of the bad news.  Not so: overall debt including monetization of the debt has increased 300%. Whereas, the budget would have you believe that each newborn child in the country is now responsible for $127,000 worth of national debt and the interest on that debt . . . Rajjpuut’s afraid the little tyke is really up to his neck in it, indeed the current President of the European Union calls Barak Obama’s recovery plan “The Road to Hell” and labeled all the deficit spending it engenders as “not wise at all,” and says it’s causing a panic in Europe.
 
            His reference to plans to buy up an additional half trillion dollars in toxic debt from financial institutions that are still not responding to the "stimulus money" which means more printing press money was in keeping for calls from many quarters to abandon the dollar as the world's reserve currency.

            As financial advisor Jimmy Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings  puts it: “This guy Geitner’s been wrong for fifteen straight years.  Bernanke? He’s been wrong for 350 consecutive weeks. They really have no idea.  Obama’s got us printing money hand over fist. I can’t say the fundamentals of  Citibank or GM are getting better. No one can get a loan, so manufacturing is stagnant and prices are going up as supply goes down.”   Inflation too will soon make prices jump.

           “Washington is increasing taxes on capital gains and energy, in a recession?  Can you believe it? They’re destroying the economy.” Rogers said the “rally in the dollar” was mind-boggling, “it’s not a stable currency.”

            Meanwhile Treasury Secretary Tim Geitner, meanwhile was caught in a lie. In response to Obama’s handling of the crisis here in the United States and the coming inflation it’s created, both China and Russia are suggesting moving away from the American dollar as the world’s reserve currency. When questioned about that suggestion, Geitner said, “We’re open to that . . . think of it as ‘evolutionary.” However when he and Bernanke were questioned less than 24 hours earlier, both men stated that they were opposed to the idea.
 
Live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Barak Get Himself Fixed?

Business Takeovers Become Barak's Newest Addiction
 
Barak the Beloved Falls Deeply in Love with
 
Government Takeovers of Troubled Businesses
 

In 1998 the system wasn’t broken but William Jefferson Clinton and the liberal Congress fixed it anyway, really fixed it, with a mortgage guarantee program that created 92% of today’s economic problems. Today eleven years later . . . since mortgage guarantees are still clearly desirable in Liberal minds (even though that’s what broke the system and the banks), Barak the Beloved is looking to give himself sweeping executive powers to jump into the public sector to takeover and 
interfere with the running of “too big to fail” companies even earlier in their downturning cycles. 

            Rajjpuut states unequivocally that the second major problem with the U.S. economy is that the mortgage laws need to be returned 100% to 1997 status. The primary problem, naturally enough, is Barak Obama and his liberal Congress themselves. They are definitely broken and need to be fixed:  perhaps resignation en masse should be considered?  And while they're doing that, how about them taking responsibility for the mess they caused in the first place.   And the term "too big to fail":  may it never ever be heard again in the English language.  Good gravy, I must have had a bad mushroom . . . here I go hallucinating again!

Live long, strong and ornery,
 
Bob
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Right" Intolerance Counter-Productive, Left 95% Wrong

 

 

Ranting then
A Brief Personal History

 then the Normal Joyous

Liberal-bashing Can Ensue

 

As a 100% fiscal conservative, readers always know where Rajjpuut’s coming from on the economy, taxes, free market, hard currency, etc. So let it be everywhere, eternally . . . world without end, AMEN!

However, before attacking the Liberal/Left for its well-known pattern of fiscal irresponsibility, let us first damn them with faint praise and probably upset a lot of the Conservative/Right in the process. Remember, Rajjpuut in his greater wisdom espouses Libertarian, not narrowly Republican virtues*: and is therefore an equal-opportunity muckraker (ya got any muck to rake?).  At this very moment, the Right is stacking all sort of blame upon the Left for the god-awful mess they've created and are still creating all around us. The questions I have for you, all of you, are these: how come they’re in power? If the Left is so blanket-blank wrong so darn often (95%?) how come they’re in power, how come they didn’t disappear with the Whig Party way back when in history? Just as a business that doesn’t in some way satisfy customers will not stay profitable and continue to exist . . . a political party that doesn’t in some way satisfy its followers (and outsiders even, from time to time) cannot continue to survive. Either they’re doing something RIGHT; or we, Conservatives are doing something wrong; or more likely:  both! 

We know that Liberals fiscal problems are with their lack of even the most basic appreciation and understanding about economics and free market capitalism: hence their perennial eagerness to ditch the baby with the wash water. However, what Liberals do so well, and the problem with the Right, and thus the eternal feeding ground that keeps the Left alive and kicking (and sometimes kicking a__) is that the Right seems to operate like a high school clique in which everyone who’s not 100% ‘perfect like us’ is considered so much dog poop. That imperfection in the past has included women, Blacks, Catholics, Mormons, Hispanics, and naturalized (not illegal) immigrants of every hue and cry.

               The Democratic Party was anchored in the south until 1948 and the Democratic Party was the Conservative party period till then. The Dixiecrats fled the Donkeys in that year angered by Truman's Democratic policies (remember those pictures of a smiling Harry Truman displaying the Chicago paper's erroneous headline “Dewey Beats Truman!” despite the Dixiecrat defection) and just what was their momentous noble issue, those Dixiecrats?  Keeping Blacks in their place via segregation and being angered by Truman's integrating the Armed Services -- doesn’t that make you proud? There were a few years of confusion and then the Dixiecrats all supported Barry Goldwater’s bid for President in 1964 and since that time the south and Conservatism has been aligned with the Republican Party. That’s the history, don’t believe me? Look it up. The Dixiecrats brought with them a lot of noble virtuous like fiscal responsibility, but Conservatives need to take a look at themselves and  learn from history not to be excluding people willy-nilly.

The most common example of this “holier-than-thou” exclusion attitude . . . well, I can’t EVER remember a Liberal asking me if I’ve been “saved,” for example. When a fellow Conservative asks me, I tell her: “Madam, my God is way too big for your tiny church.” I’d like to know where anyone gets the temerity to ask strangers such a question outside of church?  (My response was learned from my father, see the next paragraph).

There is nothing more personal than a person’s religion and that is a fact! Since I’m not being pressed, I will reveal a bit to my readers: I seldom attend church. My father angrily “ex-communicated” himself from the Catholic church when I was about six because the priest claimed Gandhi, as a pagan, was doomed to hell. Years later when my dad was older and failing in health, I used to take him to a United Methodist Church where I felt the pastor actually respected human brains and didn’t just want me throwing my wallet ahead of me as I entered. 

I am convinced that religious buildings have no more to do with real spirituality than flies with good horsemanship. On the other hand, I have actually asked for, prayed for, and been granted three great miracles in my life, one of which, a five-minute medical miracle, astounded the doctors who had just an hour before tried to convince me to follow their suggested treatment (5% chance of death; 20% chance I’d be worse off, perhaps crippled; 25% there’d be no change; and only 50% chance it would work).  My spirituality is alive and well but nobody's business but my own.  I’m pretty sure there’s NOT ONE single church anywhere in the world at any time in history that’s been perfect. In fact, a heckuva lot of them have been proven far less than perfect, and a heckuva lot of the preachers, priests and pastors have obviously had feet of clay. So give me (and mankind) a break and open your hearts a little Right-wingers, just a little. ‘Nuff said, let’s go bash some Liberals!!! Yeah, let's clobber the dumb SoG's.

The Left as a group are incredibly hypocritical when it comes to the economy. They praise imagined results (five million green-jobs) of wild government spending and never ever bother to consider where the resources come from (I call Taxpayers and others who suffer from such boondoggles: the “Invisibles,” meaning their plight is ignored or unseen by the Liberals spending and taxing) or what the actual big picture effects will be (at a loss of eleven million jobs from elsewhere in the economy; only one in ten green jobs will be permanent). And (since I just got on the Right for intolerance) the Left are clearly the most intolerant people ever when it comes to money, ideas and the U.S. Constitution. Most often the baby thrown out with the wash water by their boondoggles is the taxpayer or the Constitution . . . often both.

Right now and also back in 1929, the Left assumed the holier-than-thou mantle. When they talk about a “panic” or a “failed market” they’re talking about a personal curse that needs to be taken care of right now. And, of course in both cases they’re quick to blame free-market advocates for all the problems. Economies rise and fall, that’s the simple fact. However, interference in free markets is often the cause and no Liberal worth his salt ever wants to hear about that, oh no. In both 1933 and 2008-09, this interference is the root cause of the real disaster. Panics come and panics go, economies rise and fall, but . . . . 

The bottom of the Depression after the stock market crash begun with Black Thursday, October 24, 1929, was reached in July, 1933, just four months after Franklin Roosevelt’s March, 1933 inauguration. What did FDR’s glorious tinkering cause us? Two more stock crashes; almost exactly nine years of Depression; lack of trust from foreign investors; the possibility of inflating currency as a government tactic (gold was no longer part of the equation); and an economy that did not really rebound until about three months after World War II came along to bring full employment.

What caused the mess we’re in now? Tinkering again with the economy brought us down.  The Democrats in 1998 with a few misguided Republicans (no Libertarians) made a hidden attack on the landlord class (roughly 70% Conservatives) with a mortgage-guarantee program that would get virtually everyone into their own homes (regardless of ability to pay that mortgage). Home ownership which had been at 63-64% for 53 years went quickly to 69-70% and everyone except a few landlords were ecstatic. Then things went south, and took not only the banks, brokerages, mortgage companies and insurance companies . . . but our whole economy with them. Moral of the story: when the Liberals get excited about “market failures” tell them to grow up. Markets rise and markets fall and then they rise again; but the big market failures always have liberal tinkering as a vital component.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Bob

* Rajjpuut's long catalog of great Republican virtues starts with Respect for individual rights and individual life; Electoral College; The Bill of Fights; Honoring the Constitution; Respect for Free Markets; and rational self-interest such as found in the essay "I, Pencil;" Fiscal Responsibility; Ronald Reagan's destruction of Communism and winning the Cold War; Freeing of the Slaves; Getting Women the vote <    hold it, I'm not so sure about that one   :    (    :   )      > ;   respect for the gold standard and disdain of inflation; etc. etc.etc. etc.  I don't feel that grenade launchers are part of the Constitution, however.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Math Just Doesn’t Add up, Barak

 
Where is Yoda when we need him? 
Obama: at the Crossroads

               From time to time, all of us need a mentor, a wise advisor to keep us from straying off the "straight and narrow path."  Barak Obama needs one badly now.  I pray for the sake of the country he will find him.  I pray that some virtual"Yoda'" will show up on his door step and save him from himself; and save us along with him.  

Item:  Obama
started his presidency with an amazing set of advantages. How could you not be "beloved" after inheriting the economy left by his predecessor? 

Item: It took 220 years for the national debt to reach the level it had when George W. Bush left office.

Item: Barak Obama has set in motion fiscal forces that will double the national debt in his first year in office.

Item: Obama has promised us (threatened us with) programs that will double that debt again in roughly nine and a half years.

Item: When Obama took office the public expressed a 45% “VERY favorable” impression of him on surveys and a 15% “VERY UNfavorable” impression. In less than five months he and his administration are now perceived as 35% “VERY favorably” and 32% “VERY Unfavorably.".

Item: The amazing +30% very positive approval gap, the president enjoyed on January 20th has slipped to a +3%; his honeymoon with the American public  is ending.

Item: Spain like much of Europe was very enthusiastic about green-tech subsidies. The figures from a recent Spanish survey show: each green-tech job costs 2.2 other jobs in the economy; each green-tech job cost $775,000 to implement; only one green-tech job in ten was permanent in the Spanish study.

Item: Barak Obama has promised to create five million green-tech jobs. 

Item: If the Spanish study figures hold up, eleven million jobs will be lost elsewhere in our American economy when those five million jobs are added. 

Item:  When Obama's press secretary was asked about the figures from the Spanish survey, he responded, "We'll have to look them over.  If they're valid, we won't be buying any windmill parts from them," a totally flippant and arrogant answer to a very serious question.

               Very early on in the Obama administration, we’re already seeing signs that things are getting out of control . . .  Even that cretin Franklin Delano Roosevelt is a piker when compared to the Liberal policies of Barak Obama. Obama is the most Liberal American president ever.  The great weakness of Liberal "economic thought" is tied up in four misconceptions and Barak Obama exhibits everyone of these weaknesses, in spades:

A.       Absolute faith in government spending (and big government) as an unmitigated good able to conquer every problem

B.      A cavalier attitude toward capitalism, business, and the U.S. Constitution (just a piece of paper that often gets in the way of doing “good”) 

C.      A huge disdain for the value of traditional institutions and the people who espouse them

D.      A shocking willingness to ditch the baby with the wash water 

Obama is definitely at the crossroads. For example, if he goes ahead with his planned five million green-tech job creations and it costs eleven million jobs in our already tenuous economy: that’s definitely ditching the baby. He would be saying in effect, “I am all-wise, I know there can be a little pain and sacrifice involved (for you, not me, of course LOL), but I know best and in the long run you’ll lay laurel wreaths on my head as the savior of the economy and designer of a much better Socialist nation.”

I fear, he will go ahead full-speed.   He has shown no appreciation for, nor understanding of free-market economic truth. He wouldn’t know “I, Pencil” ** if it plunged into his ear. He doesn’t understand the fundamental flaw of economic voodoo (the broken-window parable) ^^ he’s about to commit. And it's beginning to appear that he’s a totally arrogant cuss. I wish him a quick revelation and conversion to the “force” of free-market economics, but I believe he’s about to lead us to the “dark side,” Luke.
 
Live long, strong and ornery,

Bob

** http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/i-pencil/

^^ http://jim.com/econ/chap02p1.html

 
By the way,
 
 
Covers 96% of the fallacies Barak Obama will be basing his actions upon, if he proceeds with his massive green-tech spending and creating five million green jobs
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hiccup Parable

 
 Hiccup Phobia
 
              This blog is a serious commentary. Clearly everyone knows that hiccups are a very trivial matter. Certainly hiccups do NOT rank in importance with all those supremely crucial matters to which this erudite blog is normally dedicated.  Accordingly, like the parables of Jesus in the New Testament, the hiccup will be introduced only to make a point about more serious matters, hak koff, koff.  

If you explored “hiccups” on the internet, you’d find tens of thousands of old wives’ cures and home remedies claiming to “stop hiccups.” One site I saw listed 250 such treatments. Of course, the very volume of all this speaks to ignorance. If you contract strep throat you go in and get a shot of antibiotics and barring a super-mutant strain of strep on steroids, that ends the problem. Not so with hiccups. 

 Ignorance truly is bliss sometimes, except, of course, when it is a curse. I was talking to a psychologist friend of mine the other day. He occasionally tells me about “creative treatments” for various little mental aberrations he sees from time to time and I give him the straight skinny on things like fitness and longevity from a health educator’s point of view.  On this day, James mentioned that three times in the last five years he’d encountered patients with a “hiccup phobia.” It seems that all three patients were already seeing him for relatively minor neuroses but had later stumbled upon a copy of the “Guinness Book of World Records” and become so obsessed with the possibility of developing “life-threatening hiccups” that full-blown phobias had developed. The case of American Charles Osborne who hiccupped from 1922 to 1990 documented among the world records and the sad case of a girl whose hics could be heard half a mile away seem to have struck a resonant chord with his clients and he told me his patients were not an isolated incident, but rather he and his colleagues had discussed several other such cases. 

As resident know-it-all, I told him that because I was in possession of 100% effective knowledge about how to cure hiccups with 100% effectiveness, I thought that, imparting that knowledge for him to impart to his patients could immediately

alleviate their fears:  case solved. He scoffed, as learned men are wont to do. “Don’t give me that crap, Bob, everybody has a pet way to cure hiccups. None of them work all the time.”

            I demurred, telling him, not only did I know how to clear up hiccups 100% effectively, but he did too. “Go on,” he said.

            “How would you treat a socialite who feared that her perspiration was obnoxious and had developed such a phobia of sweating in public that she truly suffered from an easily measurable excessive perspiration?”  Slyly I'd given him the rough outline of a case he'd mentioned to me fifteen years ago.

            He laughed, “No-brainer. We have her shower but apply no deodorant or anti-perspirant, then wear a sleeveless-backless gown and when she attends the next function she is to make every deliberate effort to “stink them all out” and pump out a river of sweat to drown everyone else at the party. When she emerges dry as the Sahara Desert, she’s cured.”

            “Hiccups are the same,” I claimed.

            “Son of a b____!” my learned friend said.

            And so it is.  Hiccups and perspiration, body temperature and chemical balances, pulse and digestion, respiration and salivation, eye blinks and toenail growth are all under the control of the autonomic nervous system. Left alone they are virtually infallible in carrying out their vital jobs well below the level of conscious effort, but try to control them for very long and you can do yourself a world of hurt because it’s “not nice to fool Mother Nature.”   

Despite my constant efforts, after detecting my first “hic,” to break Mr. Osborne’s world record . . . . I rarely get out a second one. When I do, then I pump my fist in the air a few times and yell, “Yes, yes, yes and strive powerfully for a quick string of five hics in a row. To date my personal record is a pathetic six hics in a row lasting perhaps 20 seconds. I am mightily ashamed I tell you. Now, you ask

“What in the world has that story got to do with anything?” What, indeed?

            As I mentioned earlier, hiccups certainly do NOT compare to weightier matters like the health care crisis, galloping socialism, inflation, the rape of the taxpayer, our new president’s interference in the free market, the rape of the taxpayer and the imminent inflation that’s been created, the choice of a shoot-from the hip judge as a Supreme Court nominee, the failure of today’s journalists to upheld their trust by keep the voting public informed through unbiased presentation of the facts of American life, etc., etc. However, perhaps we can apply the humble “Hiccup Parable” to each and everyone of those more serious subjects?

            Perhaps you would NOT be shocked to know that medical doctors here in the United States have occasionally treated “runaway” hiccups for weeks or even months at a time. The lesson that I would draw from that is to “never go where you don’t belong.” The lesson applies equally for doctors treating hiccups and presidents wasting obscene amounts of taxpayer money on bailouts instead of letting normal bankruptcies alleviate matters. What is the end result of the auto bailouts?

            Two bankruptcies, in fact, if not in name, and $100 billion in taxpayer funds wasted. What would have been the result without Obamanomics . . . two bankruptcies and not one red cent of taxpayer monies wasted.  On a more humorous personal note, three decades after the original Chrysler bailout, Lee Iacocca, the former Chairman of Chrysler in 1979 who engineered that bailout, just lost much of his pension and benefits with the recent bankruptcy of the the firm.  Talk about poetic justice, it warms the very cockles of my heart and soul.

            Those same “hiccup” doctors, never fail to charge the patients they can’t cure and don’t cure for . . . office visits and examination fees and then, of course if and when nature takes its course and the patient loses the hiccups, would you be surprised if the doctor didn’t take credit for the cure? Doctor Barak is using the “tried and true methods of the New Deal today. The economy under Roosevelt didn’t cure itself until World War II brought an economic boom and all his interferences actually heavily prolonged the stock market panic into three separate stock market crashes. Despite the fact that the figures say the bottom of the Great Depression was mid-July, 1933, 140 days after FDR took office. Roosevelt’s Depression lasted roughly nine years. 

            If perchance, the medicines the doctor’s prescribe for hiccups bring about an adverse reaction . . . unlikely, you say. Ah, well . . . did you know that an American is ten times more likely to enter the hospital for an adverse reaction to prescribed medication than for an automobile accident? He is also four times more likely to die from that very same drug reaction than from injuries in a car crash.   Extending the parable into presidential policies again . . . Doctor Barak is prescribing medications for the country that are 100% likely to bankrupt future generation and debase the American dollar through runaway inflation. As you know, some cures are much worse than the underlying problem they’re prescribed for.

            Any politician like Nancy Pelosi who has not read and understood Leonard Read’s delightful little essay, “I, Pencil” is like an M.D. who has neither read nor understood the Hippocratic Oath “First, do no harm!”) I invite all Americans to understand what makes the Free Market work and indeed, what makes civilized human societies possible:

http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/i-pencil/ 
 
Ya'all live long, strong and ornery,
Bob
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »