About Me

Name: Rajjpuut's Folly
Email: Rajjpuut@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Obama Fails to Fool All of the People All of the Time with Obamacare Bill Allowing ACORN Funding

     Two days after securing the 60 votes in the Senate needed to shove his health-care monstrosity down the throats of unwilling American voters, Barak Obama found himself with an immediate public relations nightmare. Although only 41% of American voters considered Obamacare desirable and 57% opposed it, Harry Reid and the president appear to have won the senate support necessary to obtain a 60-40 victory along party lines. This alone might have dropped the president's approval rating, but the discovery that Reid's latest offering reopens the door to ACORN funding under Obamacare appears to really be a negative for him.   It appears the backlash is immediate and angry.

     According to Rasmussen Reports Mr. Obama’s Strong Approval-Strong Disapproval rating among respondent Americans has set new lows for the second straight day. Today, Tuesday, December 22nd, among the nation’s voters only 25% strongly approved of the way Obama is performing as president while 46% strongly DISapprove giving him a presidential approval index of -21% after first hopping to a -17% rating yesterday.

      The -21% disapproval rating is the lowest yet recorded for Mr. Obama and yesterday’s -17% disapproval had been the second lowest recorded up till then. Mr. Obama who only last month showed strong approval from Black voters of roughly 80% and two weeks ago had their strong approval to the tune of 74%, now only attracts strong approval from 58% of Black voters. The disclosure yesterday that Harry Reid’s senate health care bill will allow ACORN funding was met by dismay by a large majority of Republican and unaffiliated voters.

      A majority of White voters (53%) now strongly DISapprove of his performance. Overall 52% of all men and 39% of women strongly DISapprove of Obama’s performance. Republicans (74% strongly DISapproved) overall disapproved 88%; while Democrats (47% strongly approved) showed 77% overall approval; while Independents (52% strongly DISapprove) gave Obama 62% DISapproval.

     Obama’s overall approval rating is at 43% and overall DISapproval is 56% but it is the extent of the strong DISapproval and its rapid rise in the last two days that is most shocking. These last two days have marked the first time the president’s strong DISapproval rating ever climbed above 42%, an apparent immediate backlash to Reid’s and Obama’s "public opinion be damned" tactics and the likelihood that Obamacare legislation would eventually be passed . . . and the fact that ACORN would now be eligible to play a role in Obamacare and be funded by it. The big picture is that Obama has gone from 45% strong approval with only 15% strongly disapproving in January to 46% strong DISapproval with only 25% approving today . . . opinions, especially strong opinions don't change that fast generally.

     The only shining star in Obama’s universe is that 51% of Americans still blame George W. Bush for the economic mess while 41% put the blame on Obama himself. As understanding of Obama’s and ACORN’s role in orchestrating the Cloward-Piven strategy of undermining the country with sub-prime housing loans to illegal aliens and others of questionable qualifications or obvious financial handicaps (and thus bringing on the collapse) has become better known over the last four months, Obama’s “savior” image has weakened mightily. Only lately has Obama’s overall approval rating consistently slipped below 47% and it’s now stayed there eleven days in a row.

 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I’m Just a Liberal Whose Intentions are Good, Oh Lord, Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood

 

                The liberal mindset is that “good intentions are all that matter.” If, for example, your intent is to save the environment pass a law against DDT (and then get the United Nations to back you) even though no real science is done (DDT works; is harmless to animals with four or fewer legs; and much less a problem then everything that's replaced it) and now two million extra people die in tropical lands every year (almost 60 million in all) since the law  passed based on the "science" in the novel  "Silent Spring."  Our liberal intentions were good and we can deny everything anyway.              

                 If your intent is to save the planet, get the U.N. to back you and pass massive Trillion-dollar programs to slow down and stop "man-driven global warming" even though no real science has been done and, indeed, false-science had to be done to make global warming seem scientific and even though the whole process will kill millions via starvation in undeveloped lands and ruin the economies of the wealthier nations as well.  History refutes you (the Medieval Warm Period was deliberately left out of the CRU calculations) Leif Erikson benefitted from global warming that allowed his Vikings to settle in Greenland^^ and reach North American shores without any industrialization at all anywhere on earth.  But even now global warming advocates hide their heads in the sand and pretend that first climate-gate and now the latest news of CRU corruption from Russian climatologists never happened . . . .

                The real intentions of the extreme leftists (as opposed to the ordinary leftists whose good intentions they're exploiting) advocating such nonsense is clear . . . it’s all about gaining ever more power and moving every government ever further left (away from freedom) . . .  just listen to the thunderous and continuous applause which rained down upon Communist Dictator Hugo Chavez of Venezuela while he was announcing in Copenhagen that “capitalism must be abolished” and replaced with a new system.

                Rajjpuut’s heard from a few liberals complaining about his tying ACORN and Obama to Cloward-Piven Strategy aimed at creating crises they can blame on the conservatives which undermine our very way of life. Calling Rajjpuut a “conspiracy theory nutcase,” however, will NOT erase these facts:

1.       Our nation’s total debt and obligations due to the three most well-known liberal programs (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) is actually over $100 TRillion.  Compassion (very good intentions) coupled with ineptness has brought this country to its knees.**

2.      The total debt and obligations mentioned in item #1 is multiplying daily. These three “set-asides” have been created with the intention (liberals said) that the funds necessary to run them would, indeed, be set aside like a bank account. The liberals have repeatedly, however, raided these funds since the inception of these programs to fund other liberal GSBs and GIBs (government spending boondoggles and government interference boondoggles) such as the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977 and then the two other monstrous mortgage-guarantee GIBs that followed in 1992 and 1998.

3.      Our national debt is now officially well over $12 TRillion which is more than double where it stood one year ago and the liberals wish to pass another law raising the debt limit rather than using money returned from TARP to pay down some of the debt.

4.      The following has all been documented (bragging in great detail in their public documents) by socialists out to destroy the system. The welfare state created under Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” program was immediately attacked by the leftists who created it by the Cloward-Piven strategists Richard Cloward, Frances Piven and George Wiley who deliberately created the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) with the express purpose of sowing such havoc that they felt one of two desirable (to their way of thinking) ends would arise . . . either Congress would be forced to step in and pass a National Guaranteed Income Law or the whole process would become so messy that something on the order of a semi-bloodless Marxist revolt would occur in the country. In either case, the United States would be made fundamentally different, fundamentally socialist.

5.      New York City was bankrupted after C-P Strategy (including shakedowns and violent demonstrations and the semi-lawful and unlawful registration of six million new welfare recipients within eighteen months) brought the city to its knees by 1975 and almost bankrupted the entire state as well.

6.      This strategy of abusing compassionate law continued with ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for <so-called> Reform Now) abusing the CRA to force home lenders to make large amounts of illogical loans that violated all fiduciary principles to persons with virtually zero chance of repaying those loans. Just as the CRA was a ridiculous law, the liberals also forced Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac to be involved with these terrible loans thanks to a law passed by liberals in 1992.

7.       These two laws were put on steroids by the 1998 mortgage-guarantee act.

8.      ACORN, led by lawyers like Barak Obama, had been shaking down lenders for twenty years, even before the 1998 law, using street demonstrations and other extortionary tactics closely akin to those employed by George Wiley’s NWRO in bankrupting NYC.  They have bankrupted the United States' financial system as well.

9.      ACORN has been misusing the laws and browbeating lenders to loan to illegal immigrants for roughly the last eight years.

10.   The liberals blamed “lack of regulation” of financial markets and conservatives for the financial crisis they themselves (liberals, that is) created and used that as an excuse to transform the country into bigger government socialism.

11.    The same laws are largely still on the books and ACORN and other organizations continue to move to destabilize the nation while bringing us ever and ever closer to full socialism.

        

In short, liberal “good intentions” coupled with liberal ineptness has A. bankrupted the country  B.  created and, under Obama, exacerbated the present financial fiasco and C. for 76 years now and most especially for the last 45 years:  has placed us at the mercy at those who most hate our way of life and wish to undermine it (the extreme left a.k.a. Marxists) by using our own compassion against us . . .  and then replace it.  Compassion without logical restraint makes you a sucker. Everything that sounds good and nice and charitable doesn’t always work out well and throwing money and/or legislation at perceived problems which in actuality do NOT exist is madness.  In a phrase:  the road to hell is paved with good intentions . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

 
^^ That's why it was called "Greenland" the glacial melt then was far more extensive than it is today and the island was 90% free of ice -- facts conveniently lied about by Al Gore and other fools
 
** Imagine what would have happened if all three big "safety net" GSB programs (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) had first been pre-funded by the government for a mere three years (to build up operating capital) before being introduced and then had been actual set-asides with actual accounts and never once been raided.    Imagine then, what would have happened if the congress decided that 60-65% home ownership, by far  and perennially the highest in the world, was "not broken" and had not tried to fix it with the three GIB programs (CRA '77; inflicting Fanny and Freddy in '92; and Bill Clinton's steroidal mortgage-guarantee law of '98.     The most important thing to add to that is IF either we had a gold standard or had never allowed deficit spending except in dire emergencies like WWII (gold doesn't allow deficits during ordinary times) the entire $100 Trillion mess we now own could never have occurred and we would still be the most powerful and beneficent country on earth instead of heading for the scrap heap of history if we don't radically change our ways and return to the U.S. Constitution.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Strikes Out on Foreign Policy Treks

 

              Talk is very cheap.  Some talk is cheaper even than others:   Barak Obama’s speeches are beginning to look utterly worthless when they’re not outright lies. Obama’s forays onto foreign shores for the purpose of dazzling “the natives” with his oratory have become downright pathetic exercises modeling “what NOT to do” if you’re interested in foreign policy coups . . . . 

Beginning with an ill-advised and ill-prepared effort to win the Olympic Games for Chicago; continuing with a visit to the Orient in which Tourist-in-Chief Obama returned empty-handed announcing ZERO major accomplishments; and winding up with a recent trip to Northern Europe in which he garnered an undeserved Nobel Peace Prize and attempted to give up the ghost of financial reason for the sake of rambunctious and whining would-be eco-terrorists but failed in even that . . . Barak Obama has shown himself the least effective foreign policy asset in American history. The blessing is, however, that whenever he’s wasting our money as a state-sponsored tourist, Obama is far less able to muck up the works in our economy and government here at home:  so we're damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t travel.
For our last “Obama-travel dime” Barak Obama implied that by swooping into Copenhagen on the last day like the cavalry in a grade C western, he had played the part of one-man savior of the global-warming agenda (which is, of course,  falsely documented lies in the name of science). He spoke of achieving “meaningful” agreements on climate control but advised there was still a lot of work to do. Translation:  "I goofed again. We got nothing and the whole conference just left a carbon footprint the size Nigeria created in 2006. I should be so ashamed but I know NO shame, don’t look for an apology anytime soon, or ever.” 
Get a real job, Barak!
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

December, 2009 Platinum Fleecer Award

 

                  To honor the memory of the Last Great American Statesman, William Proxmire (Wisconsin Senator for 32 years) whose “Golden Fleece Awards” uncovered shameless pork barrel projects and focused media attention on all manner of self-serving, waste, and corruption in the United States government: Rajjpuut has since June, 2009, begun to award the “Platinum Fleecer” to the elected or appointed official or private citizen most deserving of the illustrious title.

The December, 2009 Platinum Fleecer WINNERs are:

Barak Obama and ACORN

               “McCarthy (communist witch-hunter Senator “Tail-gunner” Joe) is an idiot, but that doesn’t mean he’s wrong.”   That quip from the movie “A Beautiful Mind” may soon provide the epitaph for American FREEDOM courtesy of December, 2009’s co-winners of the Platinum Fleecer Award: the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN); and Barak Obama.  Today, thanks to deliberate lack of in-depth reporting and  serious journalistic investigations for the last six years . . .  that connection is still as viable as ever and at least 2/3 of Americans are either unaware of the Obama-ACORN tie-in or think it’s perfectly innocent. . . . Our December Fleecers’ unified goals  to upend American capitalism and usher in a socialist state remain unchanged even today. The cost to Americans for all this media-driven ignorance has already been TRillions of  dollars and the upcoming cost will be tens of TRillions of dollars more as well as potentially our very freedom.

                ACORN and Obama have created a financial crisis of huge proportions in the U.S.A.; elevated Obama and his sycophants into virtual absolute control of the halls of power; and thanks to journalistic favoritism right now continue unchecked with their program to bankrupt the country. It’s not a long story, but it is somewhat complicated so let’s lay it out and bring it up to date.    To be both precise and formal, ACORN and Obama have been working together on what’s known as the “Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis” or C-P Strategy. Here is the story: 

The fate of Barak Obama and ACORN have been joined at the hip for nearly two decades.  ACORN, which has repeatedly called itself “non-partisan” while openly supporting Obama and other liberal politicians and issues only, has been the prime mover in the unprecedentedly rapid ascension of Barak Obama into the seat of ultimate power. ACORN, which sprang from George Wiley’s National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) arose from several mid-60’s radical left-wing  movements which from the start OPENLY plotted the demise of American capitalism and the American Republic as we know it.  

 The agenda that NWRO and later ACORN pursued arose from a well-known 1965 paper written by Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, who a year later published their article nationally.  Its contents became known as the infamous “Cloward-Piven Strategy” for destroying American institutions and replacing them with socialist ones. The tactics of C-P Strategy involved misusing compassionate but ill-thought out laws from LBJ’s “Great Society” push for a welfare state to undermine the American way of life by “overloading the system” the original C-P strategists, thank heaven, made some big tactical mistakes early on by publicizing first their methods and goals; and later information about their efforts and their first huge success when bragging about their role in creating the 1975 bankruptcy of New York City.  

Cloward and Piven, two Columbia University (NYC) professors who advocated a fully socialist society,  originally recruited militant Black Marxist, George Wiley in 1967.   The threesome created the NWRO, Wiley’s organization which operated something like ACORN does today, but more openly, to set C-P Strategy into effect to create a welfare crisis which then bankrupted New York City in 1975 and very nearly bankrupted the entire state of New York by rapidly placing six million extra people on the welfare rolls. Their original Plan A and Plan B, did not come to pass, however. Plan A was that the crisis created by the 6 million extra welfare recipients would force the U.S. Congress to pass a national guaranteed income act -- a huge step toward American Socialism. Plan B, Cloward’s, Piven’s and Wiley’s fondest dream was that the crisis might actually impel the country to a sort of bloodless revolution from which an entirely socialized America must emerge. 

Today C-P Strategy has been embraced by ACORN to misuse Carter’s ’77 Community Reinvestment Act and thus force lenders to offer mortgages to borrowers with no chance of repaying their loans; the ’92 modifications that forced Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac to back up the bad loans from the CRA; and finally Bill Clinton’s ’98 mortgage guarantee laws that put the whole process on steroids. The resulting financial mess, called the sub-prime lending crisis, was abetted by the efforts of Obama and lawyers like him to shake-down the banks and force huge amounts of sub-prime loans down their throats. Obama was one of the best of these lawyers at getting promises for lots of sub-prime loans and even getting many of the banks to actually contribute to ACORN despite all the bad press, embarrassing news stories, disruptive demonstrations and chaos they’d been subjected to by the group’s “street revolutionaries.”  

In a phrase, just as Cloward, Piven and Wiley were able to misuse the country’s compassionate but ill-drawn laws to bankrupt New York in ‘75, today ACORN and Barak Obama have used other similarly compassionate but ill-conceived laws to create the present financial crisis and benefit from it, to the detriment of all the rest of us. This is the real danger of GSBs and GIBs (government spending boondoggles and government interference boondoggles), compassion alone without well-executed reason can be turned like a gross weapon upon us.  

Today, most of the full effect of those three ill-conceived mortgage-guarantee laws are still the law of the land. And today ACORN is still at work forcing lenders to guarantee mortgages for illegal immigrants (unbelievably even now) and other severely sub-prime recipients . . . why, now that one of their own is in the oval office, would ACORN continue this madness? Barak Obama and ACORN have a Plan A and a Plan B, of course. Plan A: somehow the economic inanities of the first year of Obama’s administration bear fruit and Obama is labeled a “savior” and re-elected and with the new mandate for liberal action is able to transform the country to 100% socialism within eight years. Plan B? Well if Plan A fails, the C-P strategy may still carry the day. That is, ACORN may help bankrupt the nation, the capitalists may still be blamed and the country may “revolt” into full-blown socialism. In either case, you will have been fleeced. 

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

East Anglia CRU Cherry-Picked, Tampered with Russian Data

 

While Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore and Barak Obama pretend no one can see their friends hiding behind the global warming curtain, a large red shoe has just fallen in Oz. The Russian Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) claims that the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (already at the center of the climate gate controversy) tampered with Russian climate data and among other things, cherry-picked only the warmest 25% of reporting Russian stations for use in their computations.
 
On top of the original controversies which arose about CRU that British climate scientists colluded to withhold scientific evidence and manipulate data to make a stronger case for global warming then reality would support, this second falling shoe (with presumably many more to follow) may sound the death knell for all notions of human-caused global warming’s pretension at being a real science.
 
In all over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some reason or another, by CRU, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations. The Russian IEA people say CRU climatologists typically used the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the data of remote stations.  They claim the panorama from the entire set of Russian data does NOT support the theory of global warming, much less human-caused global warming. CRU has, conveniently thrown away all the original data they say their computations were based upon . . . a truly irresponsible or even criminal action quite in keeping with the corruptions shown by CRU's whistle-blown internet files. What kind of scientists throw away original raw data?
 
Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,
Rajjpuut
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Americans Now “Catching On” to Obama’s Ethics

 

                Two weeks after liberal news anchor Katie Couric said the Obama Honeymoon “seems to be ending” while she quoted surveys showing only 19% of Americans trusted Obama’s promise that if his health care initiative would NOT add to the country’s budget deficits; and only an astonishing 7% said they believed that the economic stimulus had created any jobs at all   . . . newer surveys pinpoint the problem: Americans have come to doubt Barak Obama’s ethics, indeed Americans have come to severely doubt them . . . .

                According to Rasmussen Reports, recent surveys now show that 38% of Americans say that Obama is LESS ethical than most politicians while only 32% say he is more ethical and 27% of Americans say the president’s ethics are about the same as typical politicians.  This 6% less ethical rating manifests a tremendous perceptual change by Americans. Back in January, 55% of Americans called Obama MORE ethical than most politicians while only 16% labeled him less ethical . . . an incredible 39% more ethical perception for Mr. Obama when he was inaugurated. Overall 76% of Americans say that ethics in government is a very important issue. Only unemployment and jobs was seen to be as a more important issue by American voters in recent surveys.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Strong DISapproval Rating nears 20%; Pelosi Bottoms Out

 

Despite the fact that President Barak Obama gave himself “a good solid B+”  for his first year in office when questioned recently by Oprah Winfrey, the country strongly disagrees and seemingly is more apt to give him a D-.   It  may become increasingly difficult for the Democrats in the White House and congress to ignore their constituents as their approval ratings head south for the winter. According to the highly-praised and consistently accurate Rasmussen Reports, Barak Obama has “come a long way, Baby!” 

In less than eleven months Obama’s strong approval-disapproval rating has dropped from +28% the day after his inauguration to -18% today, an unbelievable swing of 46 points for the first time in Rasmussen history. In January 44% of voting respondents strongly approved of president Obama while only 16% strongly disapproved.   Today only 24% said they strongly approved of the president’s job performance while 42% strongly disapproved. Overall 44% of would-be voters state they have at least some approval of Obama’s performance while 55% now say they have at least some disapproval which takes Mr. Obama beyond the critical -10% overall disapproval level where the power of the “bully pulpit is greatly diminished. The president earns at least some approval from 98% of Black voters but only 37% of White voters. 72% of Democrats approve at least somewhat but only 36% of unaffiliated voters and 20% of Republicans show any approval for his job performance so far.  Only 30% of Americans believe the country is heading the right way while 65% of voters believe America’s “on the wrong track.”

In the Oprah Winfrey interview, Obama said that if his Obamacare health care “reform” bill is passed his grade will jump up to an “A-“ but 56% of Americans are opposed to the Democrats attempts at passing the bill and 76% say that jobs creation is the #1 job and Obama’s push for global warming and health care legislation is far less important. Only 21% say that health care will improve if the bill is passed while 54% say it will get worse.  63% of senior citizens are opposed.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, however, makes Obama still look like the “Rock Star” he once was. Only 9% of American voters had a very favorable impression of the liberal speaker while 45% had a very unfavorable view of her according to Rasmussen. Overall 38% showed at least some approval of Ms. Pelosi while 58% expressed strong disapproval. Pelosi continues to be one of the most well-known and disliked politicians in the country.

 

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Alinsky, Cloward-Piven, ACORN, Ayers and Obama

   

         Americans have a bad habit of thinking not only that everybody else should be like us, but far too often assuming that every well-educated charming person in the world, IS fundamentally just exactly like us in thought, actions and goals. In the case of Barak Obama, however, never has this American tendency toward gullibility been more misplaced. Barak Obama is as different from the “common American people” he professes to care about as venom is from water. Can this be so?  If there is any truth to the old adage, “the fruit never falls far from the tree,” it is so.

         By some “hook,” but mostly by a lot of “crook,” Barak Obama is making good on his threat to “fundamentally transform America.” That is, to transform America into his vision of America, not yours. Thanks to the reverence accorded him by the left-leaning mainstream media, very little is actually known about Obama, their president, but certainly not Rajjpuut’s and hopefully (as more and more Americans learn more and more about him from background, action and inconguency of his words) not your president either.

He was elected to the senate in late 2004.  He then began running for the oval office almost immediately and resigned from the senate without serving even a full three years there, being absent from an incredible amount of senate votes and voting “present” on numerous occasions in the nominal 46 months he was in office. When he did cast an actual substantive vote, he piled up a record even left of Ted Kennedy. His speed in hopping from the senate into the oval office and also the shimmering cape of invisibility and benign nostalgia covering his early life makes Barak Obama the largest enigma that has ever occupied 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue.

         Obama completed two autobiographies before he completed twenty months in the U.S. Senate, though in truth “Dreams of My Father was definitely written by Bill Ayers, the convicted bomb-planting terrorist who up until Obama decided to put more troops into Afghanistan ten days ago considered Barak Obama a close personal friend (Ayers recently helped lead a protest over "the surge" through the streets of Chicago).  Ayers finished compiling, writing and editing Obama’s book from a pile of notes and transcribed interviews and it was published in the middle of 1995. The story of how Ayers’ authorship was discovered, years before Ayers himself admitted it can be found here:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79392

An incredible amount of “Barak’s adventures, comments and observations” seemingly came directly from three of Ayers’ own books with only slight dilution. The job was made easier because Ayer began his own career (as a radical left-wing activist) as a Cleveland community organizer. Both Ayers and Barak Hussein Obama, Jr.  apparently learned a lot from the mistakes of his father Barak Hussein Obama, Sr. The elder Obama lost his powerful post in the fledgling Kenyan government because according to Barak, Jr.’s half sister “He couldn’t keep his mouth shut” about transforming Kenya into Marxist Eden. Barak, Jr. has not made that same mistake . . . he’s never openly admitted that he sees himself transforming America into a communist paradise, nor for public consumption ever admitting to socialistic, Marxist or communist leanings.

         Aloud and quite often in print as well, Barak, Sr. was notorious for incessantly pushing the leaders of Kenya to expedite implementation of a communist government. Several times he used the phrase “100% tax” in justification of and laying  the groundwork for understanding the principles of “a more fair and productive economy.” 

          It’s not known if the credit goes to Ayers or Obama or both for failure to mention that Barak Obama, Jr.’s mother was a communist, his father whom he communicated with often (despite the mainstream media’s implication there was almost no contact between them) until the older man’s death, was a communist and most importantly his grandfather and the people his grandfather brought into the household to enlighten Barak were quite famous communists like Frank Marshall Davis the poet and briefly later in Chicago Saul Alinsky, the author of “Rules for Radicals.” Marshall counselled Barak both in Hawaii and later in Chicago and with his grandfather, mother and father brought the most enduring influences to young Barry (he did not like the name 'Barak' early on and attended college as 'Barry Soweto' taking the surname of his mother's second husband an Indonesian Muslim businessman).

         His grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham who arranged Obama's mentorship chiefly by Frank Marshall Davis, was, of course, also the father of and chief inspiration for Barak Obama’s mother whom he named after himself, Stanley Ann Dunham. Marshall advised Barak to be very careful around Whites, since “they can only understand so much” about the Black struggle “the rest is lost on them.” And from early on mother, grandfather and the poet Marshall had him understanding, the evils of capitalism and our American society based upon evil capitalism.  Later Barak, as a community organizer taught courses based upon Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals."  Unfortunately, while Alinsky was too free a thinker to ever join anything where he wasn't pretty much in charge, whether it was Christianity or Marxism, Obama had long been a "true-believer" in the necessity for Marxism and he did everything he did truly believing that he was doing good for the downtrodden masses and army of oppressed workers and people of color.

         His mother met Barak, Sr. at a Russian class at Hawaii U. Born a “red-diaper baby,” Barak, Jr., by the time he was in high school in Honolulu and met Barak, Sr. and spent a month with his father had undoubtedly spent at least a dozen years fighting communism’s “battle of dialectic materialism.”   You can imagine young Barak being told repeatedly about “the mission;” "justice for the workers;” “the war between history’s oppressed and capitalism.” 

Hearing his mother and his grandfather saying almost from the time Barak learned to talk, “We are in a war,  for the people" had to carry a huge impact in the boy's life.  Most kids don't ever get enough attention from adults; young communists canNOT escape constant indoctrination by every adult who knows them.  "Look around you, see how hard the common man must work. Look at the things going on in this city, do you think the cooks, the waiters and waitresses, the cab drivers, the people who toil in the pineapple fields do you think they’re getting a fair shake from the capitalists? Those people are like grotesque weeds in a garden . . . until they’re pulled the garden can’t thrive.” 

         By the time he met his father Barak, Sr.,  he’d probably heard the “hard stuff” about Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Alinsky and just maybe about Cloward and Piven, names he could never speak openly except when among “fellow travellers. ”So great was Barak’s antipathy toward things capitalistic that in “Dreams From My Father” he tells about working at his only real job in the corporate world and feeling “like I was behind enemy lines” one of about thirty parallel constructions (some of them several paragraphs long) between “DfMF” and the books of Ayers.  In any case, whoever wrote it, the line was in Obama's book.
         Saul Alinsky was a communist-sympathizing community organizer and while exactly how much of a personal influence Alinsky was upon Barak is fairly debatable, one thing is certain, he was an important influence, if only by his reputation for  audacious and highly imaginative ways of bringing the plight of the poor to the attention of the authorities and general public. Alinsky’s sense of America, however, is clearly not shared by Barak Obama. Obama took the infamous “Cloward-Piven” strategy that George Wiley used to bankrupt New York City, and almost the entire state, in 1975 and with his sidekicks from ACORN turned it upon the United States as a whole . . .  while Alinsky apparently loved America while severely criticizing her inequities, Obama's patriotism is yet to be shown.
 
Once again Barak learned a valuable lesson from his father, while Wiley, Piven and Cloward openly bragged and documented their “feats” in putting six million extra people on the welfare rolls from 1967-1975 which they hoped would force the United States toward open revolution and definitely, they thought, force Congress into “redistribution of wealth” via enactment of a “guaranteed wage” law. Barak -- who with ACORN abused CRA ’77; and the ’92 Freddy and Fanny mortgage-guarantee acts to shakedown and blackmail lenders into forced home loans to ultra-high risk borrowers – was too wise to brag about his “accomplishments.” Certainly when Bill Clinton’s ’98 mortgage guarantee legislation and ACORN’s later tactic of enrolling illegal aliens for mortgage-guaranteed loans put the whole process on steroids . . . Obama’s earlier work lost much of its glitter but, doubt not, Barak Obama was a pioneer in putting into motion the process that brought America to its knees in 2008.
 

Most of those same laws are still on the books and ACORN is still enlisting foot soldiers (the poor) for the revolution with the same Cloward-Piven aims in mind. Thus Barak Obama believes he holds a “heads, I win, tails, you lose,” proposition in his hand. Plan A: his ridiculous economic measures not only gain unprecedented centralized power for the Democratic Party and himself but actually work and he is nominated for savior, etc. Plan B: still blaming the Republicans for the mess he and leftist Democrats created, the country can be totally bankrupted, most importantly the 50 individual states can be totally bankrupted making the term “United States” meaningless as all things shift to a powerful centralized government expected to save us all and even more quickly than we’ve seen so far . . . a Marxist totalitarian state is created, with guess who playing the role of Big Brother?

      Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

      Rajjpuut

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Will Obama’s Coming Dollar Devaluation Mean to You?

                  Thanks to the efforts of Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Boss, and Barak Obama, first Marxist president wannabe, there are now fifteen times as many dollars circulating as there were at the end of 2008.  In response the value of the dollar against other nation’s currencies has plummeted 14% and clearly the potential for further drops are substantial.  It’s a seriously dangerous  situation . . . . 
 
  Bernanke, naturally persists in keeping the nation’s interests rates at historic lows as he hopes against hope that some sort of tangible recovery ensues, then with a little more luck and a balancing act, all can (he hopes) be returned judiciously to some semblance of normal . . . .  Despite Bernanke's pipe dreams, inflation is a certainty, hyperinflation likely and perhaps even runaway inflation. The borrowing necessary (to cover all the deficit spending and the increasing national debt and the interest on that debt) to keep some semblance of order in American financial markets has become problematical.   Countries which previously loved to buy up American debt instruments are now far more reluctant to do so.  It takes higher interest rates to motivate them.  

                    Meanwhile, Russia, India and China are all suggesting that the planet move away from the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. The country will need an immense amount of luck to avoid the fate of Japan (following that country’s all-out meltdown in 1986, Japan has been in the throes of financial ruin for almost 23 years now). The only thing helping us is TRADITION: the world’s people are used to the dollar being their reliable storehouse of value and are reluctant to believe that the piece of paper they now hold has no semblance to the paper they once held . . . how far will that tradition protect us?

                If significant inflation of the dollar occurs and Barak Obama allows its buying power to devalue so that the 2010 dollar is worth just six  or seven cents of the 2008 dollar’s value, a distinct possibility . . . the effect upon the world will be drastic and upon American citizens, worse yet. 

                As a boy, Rajjpuut lived in Germany and well remembers collecting thin paper stamps from Germany’s Weimar Republic whose nominal value on the face of the stamp had been crossed out once or even twice during the minting/printing process with a much higher finalized cost required when the stamp was ultimately sold. Even then, several decades after the fact, the older Germans well remembered when a Billion Deutsch Marks would buy you a scraggly dried handful of turnips; when workers demanded their pay once a day – and then twice a day – and at the end three times daily, so that they might immediately spend it and get some value from the money before the constant erosion of value left it virtually worthless. Ol’ Rajjpuut also remembers his shiny mint quality Adolf Hitler stamps issued just a decade later with their incredibly low denominations . . . it takes no imagination at all to realize that the Weimar Republic’s runaway inflation led step by step toward the country’s abyss and Der Fuehrer’s rise.

                For those of you interested in your own fate financial and otherwise, should Obama’s probable dollar devaluation occur and other present trends continue, Rajjpuut recommends Eric Maria Remarque’s novel “The Black Obelisk” for a play-by-play of survival during those crucial times in Germany. Remarque, best known for his two novels, “All Quiet on the Western Front” and “The Spark of Life,” captures our own potential fate quite vividly and compassionately.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leftist, Native Chicago Judge Calls Defunding ACORN “Unconstitutional”

 

            On Friday, December 11, Judge Nina Gershon issued a preliminary injunction against the United States Government preventing the implementation of a law stripping ACORN of federal funding by,  reliable sources say, calling the measure “unconstitutional.” Don’t we live in a wonderful country?

            You see, Judge, ACORN is a Marxist group which has for over 30 years hiding behind the guise of helping poor people, employed Cloward-Piven tactics to bankrupt the United States government, perhaps that ought to be considered unconstitutional as well?   What? Now you say you don’t know what “Cloward-Piven tactics” or Cloward-Piven strategy is all about? Difficult to believe for an ultra-leftist judge who consistently and continuously makes law from the bench, but let Ol’ Rajjpuut help you . . .

            Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven were two Marxist professors at Columbia University (NY) who in 1965 created and published their infamous “Cloward-Piven Strategy” designed to bankrupt capitalistic society and (depending upon who’s telling the story) either inspire an impromptu Marxist revolution; or force the U.S. Government to enact a universal guaranteed-income law, thus they believed abolishing poverty on the spot (apparently the good profs had never read Henry Hazlitt’s “Economics in One Lesson). 

Cloward and Piven recruited a militant Black community organizer named George Wiley to put their ideas into action. Wiley, with C-P help set up his NWRO (National Welfare Right Organization in 1967 and by 1969 added six million extra people to the welfare rolls largely by browbeating bureaucrats and performing “street-revolt demonstrations” such as ACORN employed often between 1992 and 2007 to “embarrass the system.” The impact was predictable: by 1975, New York City was officially bankrupted and the State of New York was only slightly better off. The trio, naturally bragged about their success and documented the history of it.

ACORN has been working the same miracle on the federal government using the 1977 Community Reorganization Act (CRA) forcing lending institutions to make ultra-risky home loans to  people who objectively had 0% chance of repaying their mortgage. Jimmy Carter was proud to sign that little miracle into law.   In 1992 the Democratic-controlled congress overrode a George H.W. Bush veto to pass legislation requiring Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae to prop up the shaky foundation of all those risky mortgage-guarantees required by CRA. In 1998, Bill Clinton’s own version of mortgage-guarantee legislation put CRA, etc. on steroids.

Barak Obama was an ACORN lawyer starting in 1995 and his job was to extort banks into foolish compliance with the mortgage-guarantee laws that would soon ruin them and ruin the nation. It was a sub-prime loan shakedown racket and Barak Obama was so good at it that he almost never had to go to court but typically in a matter of days had the banks agreeing to ultra-risky loans AND making a donation to ACORN. Chicago ACORN director Madeline Talbott had incredibly blocked a bank merger in 1990 for “non-CRA compliance” and from them on Talbott, Obama and their ilk ran their shameless racket on every bank possible. To the top ACORN people, if seven people in a hundred were actually able to payoff their homes that would have been a wondrous miracle. To the banks the whole shameless scam was ruination itself.

So these are the people that you, Judge Gershon are protecting with your ill-advised decision that this is a constitutional matter, people who despise the U.S. Constitution who won’t rest till it’s in ashes and our economic system has been pulled down around us. Nice work, your honor . . . .

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congressional Testicles Needed to Stand Up to Obama EPA Ultimatum!


                The thirteen and a half years worth of documents and e-mails, now on full display for the world courtesy of the Climate Gate whistle-blower, have forced the Leftist liars to move in desperation toward consolidating the once-great advantage they formerly held over public opinion.  Opponents to global warming and all manner of environmental blackmail, now clearly have the high ground:  all that's needed is a bit of patience and courage for the United States to get back to sanity . . . .

Before going further, by the way, the notion that some miscreant hacker has made a criminal entry into bona fide scientific work is balderdash because a careful study will tell the reader that ALL  the e-mail archives found among the 61 megabytes of leaked information are designated by Unix time stamping from Thu, 07 Mar 1996 14:41:07 GMT through Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:17:44 GMT.   In other words they are ALL extracted from an enterprise archive, probably by the FOIA Compliance Officer and not hacked from individual’s workstations. The big picture is that in response to Phil Jones’ efforts to make an end run around legitimate Freedom of Information Act requests of the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU) someone inside deliberately copied all the FOIA data and placed the lump sum of it on the Russian website. 

In Copenhagen and here in the United States panic has set in . . . in an effort to quickly get this “nightmare” behind them the leftwing proselytizers of a now devalued “science” are feigning ignorance of the Climate Gate truth and putting on a brave front. In some places the scam is working:  recently in New Zealand the legislature there opted for full cap and trade insanity in sharp contrast to Australia’s wiser denial of the flimsy and oft-falsified evidence backing the lie of global warming. 

President Obama has threatened the United States that if Cap and Trade isn’t passed immediately, he will sic the EPA on the country. Saying basically, “give me what a want (a “measured and logical” environmentally-friendly law, he says) or I will act to destroy the American economy with heavy handed interference in every aspect of American life. Mr. Obama and the Leftists are denying Climate Gate and pushing hard for Cap and Trade, seemingly ignorant of the truth that almost 31,500 American scientists (including over 9,000 Ph.D.s) have known all along and signed this online petition to verify their stance AGAINST global warming.

http://www.petitionproject.org/

The country, more specifically the Congress must stand up to Obama’s ultimatum. In fact, the country needs to reject out of hand all further interference from the EPA into all commercial aspects of the nation until such time as a reasonable person is president of the United States. 

The EPA has already interfered nastily in Fresno County, California, the Vegetable Basket of the Nation in the middle of a multi-year drought. Thanks to EPA interference, virtually all normal irrigation in the county has been curtailed. According to the EPA the delta smelt, a tiny “endangered” fish, is routinely sucked into irrigation piping and therefore irrigation is halted.   

Rajjpuut suggest immediately that the two houses of congress collectively grow some testicles and collectively rise in righteous protest to this insanity. That righteous protest would begin with passing a straightforward one page law making the Environmental Protection Agency responsible for reporting all “suspected” instances of environmental problems to the Congress and that Congress decide upon all environmental responses, if any, to each suspected problem. 

For example, the Congress might make $150,000 available to discover and recommend sane methods to help the smelt to help themselves (perhaps screening of a certain size required around an eight-foot circumference of the intake; perhaps recordings of certain sounds might prevent the smelt-suicider from approaching the pipe intake) anything sane that doesn’t put 41% of the Fresno workers out of jobs and threaten the nation’s food supply will do. It is high time to bring an insane administration back to sanity.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What’s a Nobel Peace Prize Worth, these days? Party Goers Didn’t Really Know.

  
                 After "scoring" an informal survey about the Nobel Peace Prize passed out by the “Ol’ Rajjpuut Polling Group” at a recent party, three things were evident:

1)      Americans aren’t real sure who’s giving out the Nobel Prize these days or how many prizes there are.  Sorry, Friends, “Scandanavia” is not acceptable, “Copenhagen” is not acceptable, and “Denmark” is not acceptable. Among those who at least had a clue, Norway and Sweden split the rest of the “guesses.”  Three times this week Rajjpuut heard Oslo, Norway mentioned by television newscasters for the Nobel Prizes, plural, rather than Stockholm, Sweden which is what inspired Rajjpuut’s “survey.” The fact is that the prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Literature and Medicine have been handed out in Stockholm, Sweden, since Alfred Nobel’s death.   Likewise, the Peace Prize has been handed out in Oslo, Norway from the start . . . and no, there is NO prize for mathematics. John Nash, the mathematician (subject of the Oscar-winning movie “A Beautiful Mind”) shared the 1994 Nobel Prize for Economics which first was awarded about 1970.

2)     Rooughly 80% of the partygoers either didn’t know who Alfred Nobel was, or what he did, or why he created the Nobel Prizes. Nobel was the Swedish version of Thomas Edison.   A good deal of his energy went into armament research and he invented dynamite by combining nitroglycerin with an absorbent, inert substance (sort of like sawdust). A French newspaper screwed up in 1886 and declared Nobel dead. The obituary was very negative and contained the line “The merchant of death is now dead.” The story is that the shock of that obituary inspired Nobel to write a last will and testament which after his death in 1896 created the Nobel Prize Foundation.

3)     If the party was representative of Americans in general, our knowledge of the Nobel Peace Prize is really poor. Only one person answered the following question correctly:

Which TWO of these statements are TRUEST?**

  1. Adolf Hitler was a leading Nobel Peace Prize nominee up until the invasion of Poland.
  2. Albert Schweitzer and Mother Teresa both won the Peace Prize.
  3. Mohandas K. Gandhi never received the Nobel Peace Prize despite being nominated five times.
  4. Neither of the American Presidents who spoke in front of the Berlin Wall received the Peace Prize.
  5. Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson both won the Peace Prize.
  6. The person considered the most controversial Peace Price omission was actually scheduled to receive the prize but was assassinated late in the year and no posthumous Nobel Prizes are ever awarded.
  7. All of the above . . .
  8. None of the above . . .
  9. This a trick question, isn’t it, you dirty bas____?

While there is always a bit of controversy over the other prizes (for example, it seems that somebody important is ALWAYS left out of at least one prize), the Peace Prize is clearly the most controversial and thought by many people to have recently become a political statement by the Swedes and to have little or nothing to do with PEACE itself.

In Rajjpuut’s estimation six of the top seven or eight Nobel Peace Prizes were those awarded to Nelson Mandela, Albert Schweitzer, Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Al Gore and Barak Obama – ooops, just kidding on those last two fellows.   Some of the nominees in the past like Adolf Hitler and Neville Chamberlain clearly no more deserved a Peace Prize than Rajjpuut deserves a prize for tact. Some of the winners like Gore, Obama and Carter seem to be purely political statements by the Swedes about what type of Americans they approve of. Obama has clearly p’o’ ed the Nobel Prize Committee by beginning a 30,000 troop-surge in Afghanistan after being named Peace Prize winner. If Hitler had waited a bit longer to invade Poland, Adolf might have found himself in a similar situation
 
. . . so much for the validity of some Peace Prizes.

                The biggest controversy about the Peace Prize has always been over the role of appeasement . . .  this year’s prize to Obama is really bizarre. The president was only in office for two weeks when he was nominated, a shocker considering that Schweitzer, MLK, and Mother Teresa earned their prizes for a lifetime’s work. To imagine that Neville Chamberlain and Hitler could ever be considered strong nominees for such an award, peace without honor must be very popular among those who decide on the Nobel Peace Prize. Folks like Churchill, JFK and Ronald Reagan NOT earning a peace prize is a travesty, all things considered.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** Items “G” and “I” are the “TRUEST” since to name only two of the absolutely true five statements found in ABCDE would mean that the other three choices are actually false or at least substantially so . . . sorry about the trick!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate Alarmists Deny Being Dumber Than 5th Graders

An Arctic civilization called “Atlantis” spewed out megatons of greenhouse gasses,  made Greenland green and helped Leif Ericson . . . then it sunk into the sea . . . .

After a whole lot of hoopla last week at a “jobs conference,” Mr. Obama then had the EPA label CO2 “a dangerous pollutant” at a time when global warming, CO2 emissions and the so-called science tying the two factors together has been shown to be a scam created by, among others, scientists at the East Anglia University Climate Research Unit (CRU). The fact of the matter is that the earth is cooling . . . more on that later, but it's likely the EPA's action will kill 1.2 million jobs, nice work, Mr. President!^^

                Unlike real scientists, the global warming hucksters repeatedly talk about “scientific consensus” ( a lie@@) and tell sob stories about polar bears and sinking islands that don’t hold up when the facts are checked. 
Defensiveness and emotionality are the sort of things you expect from priests trying someone for witchcraft, not from bona fide scientists. Did Rajjpuut already mention that the earth is actually cooling?

                Scientific research might be difficult and take a lot of imagination to construct but at the end of the day we’re talking about congruent facts, coherent reasoning and hardnosed treatment of evidence.

                First of all, every grade school kid that the earth is NOT always at the same temperature. We have seasons, thankfully, because the earth tilts on its axis otherwise the earth would burn up in when closest to the sun and freeze when furthest away. Every grade school kid also knows that there are long, long periods of great fluctuation in average temperature (climate shifts such as the ice ages). Anybody who took the time to watch the History Channel DVD “Little Ice Age, Big Chill” would also know we have other semi-long-term fluctuations such as the Little Ice Age (1300-1850) and the Medieval Warm Period (780-1300) that preceded it. The Climate Gate material has proved that the CRU scientists conspired NOT to include the Medieval Warm Period in their 2500 year climate record, thus totally skewing the figures they used. (take the hottest 550 years in the last 2,500 years out of your calculations and the world’s average temperature (SURPRISE!) will definitely seem much cooler than it truly was and that'll make even a slight rise in today's temperatures look huge . 

                Every grade school kid knows that Viking Eric the Red’s lad Leif Ericson discovered Greenland and sometime around 1000 A.D. discovered North America roughly 500 years before Columbus’ first voyage. Why the school kid asks is Greenland called “Greenland” when its covered by snow, ice and sometimes 99% covered by glaciers? “Well, Bobby, in those days, Iceland and Greenland and a lot of the north of Canada really didn’t have many glaciers and Greenland really was green.” Of course when young Rajjpuut asked Mrs. Croutch,  “Why was it warmer back then?” she couldn’t tell him but just said that “the earth goes through cycles when it’s much colder and much hotter.” Little did Mrs. Croutch or young Rajjpuut know that there was actually an advanced Arctic civilization called Atlantis at that time spewing out megaton after megaton of water vapor, CO2 and methane gas and driving global warming . . . boy it’s a good thing that Atlantis sunk into the sea, huh?

                Older Rajjpuut watching the History Channel’s dvd “Little Ice Age, Big Chill” was of course shocked that Atlantis’ contribution to global warming in the Medieval Warm Period was never mentioned . . . ooops, maybe the Ol’ Boy told a little fib there, nothing, of course like the fibs they’ve been telling at CRU for the last thirteen years . . . . so what is the truth? Did Rajjpuut mention the earth is actually cooling?

Let’s talk about that cooling . . . . John Holdren, Obama’s science czar said so, said we were going to run ourselves into an Ice Age because of man-made global cooling (he wasn’t real sure of the mechanism) and he later wrote a book called “Eco-Science” that advocated all sorts of extreme population control measures (like secret sterilants in the drinking water, forced abortions, etc.) because of loss of plant growing acreage and over-population.  

Indeed, in an earlier book (1971) called Global Ecology: Readings Toward a Rational Strategy for Man,” Holdren wrote part of Chapter 6 and said a “new ice age” was likely and was caused by human activity. So he’s been a global climate alarmist for almost 40 years now, but he’s even more infamously also been a global over-population alarmist for just as long. In a phrase, Rajjpuut’s dried out hemorrhoid knows more about science right now than John Holdren’s learned in the last fifty years. To make it short but sweet, Ol’ Rajjpuut hemorrhoid knows that “Your say-so, don’t make it so,” while Mr. Holdren in arguments shown by CRU e-mail continuously let's his "scientific argument" degenerate into "I'm the expert here and what I say is true, is true."  Here’s the Holdren 1971 claim from the book just mentioned (this is an example of “evidence” which is a scientific concept Holdren never learned about:

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/wp-content/images2009/Global_Ec_titlefull.jpg

                Now the creepy folks doing all the cheating science at the East Anglia CRU are not well-known outside the scientific community, but Mr. John Holdren is and Mr. Al Gore is even more infamous. Mr. Al Gore is a far more infamous liar and climate alarmist than Mr. Holdren. Mr. Al Gore was within striking range of becoming the first global-warming billionaire until a few weeks ago when all those damnable e-mails and documents came out from CRU . . . .

                Mr. Gore was originally a tobacco grower. When his sister died of her tobacco habit, however, Mr. Gore became anti-tobacco, in much the same way that Mr. Holdren went from global cooling to global warming. It’s a liberal thing to do . . . . In fairness to Mr. Gore, that was apparently the last time he got anything right.  Mr. Gore invented the internet and probably hates what his invention’s done to his chances to be the first global warming billionaire. Mr. Gore is what’s called a “crusader” for global warming. A crusader is someone who can tell other people to do stuff that he would never do himself, a crusader is sort of the opposite of a leader. Mr. Gore owns a mansion. An energy audit of his mansion showed that Mr. Gore’s mansion uses twenty times more energy (i.e. his “carbon footprint” is 20X greater) in one month than an average person’s home uses in a whole year. Mr. Gore is also too good to travel with us peons on a plane. He owns a very inefficient private plane so his flying is probably about 20X worse for the environment in a month compared to the CO2 and other pollution that a normal person would create in a lifetime.

                Mr. Gore is then: a hypocrite. Mr. Gore also knows nothing about science and he lies with virtually every word out of his mouth about “global warming.” For example, Mr. Gore loves making wild statements that even the NY Times admits are wrong, like:

  1. 1.        “Mankind has never experienced any environmental shift REMOTELY similar to the changes threatening us from global warming.” If you look at the last 15,000 years worth of average earth temperatures there have been at least a dozen shifts greater and some have been up to “20 times greater than the supposed warming in the last century.”
  2. 2.      “Today marks the hottest temperatures the earth has known since the last ice age.” The same 15,000 year temperature trend chart would show that at least eight huge warming trends have occurred and it’s definitely been much warmer than today. Before the last ice age;  then again about 7,000 BC; and 5,000 BC; during Roman times; and, of course during the Medieval Warm period that preceded the Little Ice Age.

3.      3.  “Because of industrialization, the earth’s temperature has been rising steadily since the 20th Century dawned (0.6 degrees centigrade) and we might see a rise up to four more degrees by the end of the 21st Century severely endangering plant and animal life and flooding out low-lying human living space.” Mr. Gore here uses a lie told by Mr. Phil Jones of the CRU. Mr. Phil Jones has no idea what the temperatures did in the 20th Century, he made the number 0.6 degrees centigrade up out of pure blue sky, he cannot document the number. Real scientists actually say the earth cooled between about 1945 and 1977 despite rapidly increasing industrialization. It has also cooled over the last nine or ten or so years. Mr. Gore and Mr. Holdren and Mr. Phil Jones have no idea what the earth’s climate will choose to do . . . or what that change if any will mean to animal and plant life and low-lying populated areas. Right now, there is absolutely NO correlation between man-made greenhouse gasses and the earth’s temperature. We just are too ignorant at present to accurately predict what’s happening or what will happen to earth’s temperature. Since global warming seems only to bring power and money to the alarmists and the alarmists canNOT predict what the earth will do, there is absolutely no reason to ever take them seriously, ever let them control our lives or ever let them take our money again. AMEN***!

Ya'all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
 
@@ http://www.petitionproject.org/   so-called scientific "consensus" is useless; one Edison can prove an awful lot of people wrong to our great benefit; but here are 31,000+ scientists and 9,100+ Ph.D. scientists who strongly disagree . . . .
 
^^ One of the highest unemployment rates in the country is found around Fresno, in central California, where the EPA in its wisdom, in the middle of a drought, has forbidden the nation's "Vegetable Basket" to irrigate.  The irrigation it says will harm "delta smelt" a tiny fish that likes to swim into irrigation piping and which the EPA considers "endangered."  41% unemployment is now the fact in some parts of Fresno County and higher vegetable prices will be coming our way.  Nice job, Mr. Prez! 
 
***  A.  While he is in Copenhagen later this month, Mr. Obama is likely to promise to give about $300 Billion to the U.N. to pay for the United States' "excessive carbon footprint."  With a bit of luck the congress will grow some testicles and not honor Mr. Obama's reckless promise . . . thus saving the nation from the bankruptcy Obama's aiming us for.
 
        B.  Cap and Trade legislation presently in the senate would cost the United States $220 Billion each and every year till forever
        C.  Mr. Obama's "promise" (Rajjpuut calls it a THREAT) to create "five million new green-tech jobs" when extrapolated from a recent Spanish program of similar high hopes will create 90% of its jobs that will pay $10-$16 per hour; last only somewhere between three weeks and eighteen months.  At the end we will have lost 11 million real permanent jobs from the wider economy and only have 500, o00 permanent green-tech jobs to show for it.  2.2 jobs were lost creating each Spanish green-tech job and only 10% of the green jobs proved permanent.  Government CANNOT create jobs, government can just shift money from one place to another hurting a bunch of people to reward government favorites.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rasmussen -- Americans distrust the UN, Disbelieve Global Warming

   

Just 36 hours after an informal non-scientific poll by Fox News showed 59% of Americans believe that global warming science has been “rigged,” the highly trusted Rasmussen Reports conducted a wide-ranging survey of American attitudes surrounding the issue. Their report showed that most Americans believe the science is clearly NOT settled on global warming despite what the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Al Gore and the infamous Climate Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia University in England say on the matter.

                According to the recent opinion poll conducted by Rasmussen, 52% of Americans believe that there is still significant disagreement within the scientific community over global warming’s validity. Only 25% of Americans think most scientists agree on the topic; while 23% say they are unsure whether scientific agreement exists. Like the informal Fox News poll, Rasmussen says 59% of Americans believe it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research to supporth their own theories on global warming; 35% say the falsification is very likely; and just 26% say it’s not very or not at all likely that some falsification of data occurred. 

The big surprise, however, in the Rasmussen poll is that the recent Climate Gate disclosures of a whistle-blower leaking CRU e-mails and documents has played very little role in the doubts of Americans about global warming. Only 20% of Americans say they’ve followed the CRU news very closely and 29% say they’ve followed it somewhat closely.  Part of the reason may be that the mainstream media has not covered the story and only Fox News has devoted much time to it. Indeed, according to Rasmussen officials many more Americans have followed the White House party crashers seriously than the Climate Gate revelations. According to Rasmussen, the fact that the United Nations has played such a prominent role in promoting the global warming issue may explain the doubts most Americans harbor. 

Only 22% of Americans regard the UN as a reliable source on global warming; while a full 49% say the UN is NOT reliable on the topic; and 29% say they’re unsure about the UN’s reliability.   Obama is presently headed to the UN Summit on Global Warming in Copenhagen, Denmark after recently committing the USA to a 17% emissions cut by 2020 if Congress will agree to it. Critics say the cut will devastate the American economy. Even while Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing major anti-global warming initiatives like “Cap and Trade” legislation and creation of green tech jobs, 71% of Americans doubt that green jobs can be created without seriously harming the mainstream American economy. Virtually the same 71% of Americans believe that stimulating the economy and the technology we already (such as oil drilling) have now should be the primary concern for elected officials since only 14% of those polled said the firms they’re working for are now hiring. 

A lesser surprise occurred here also as Republicans are much more serious about job creation even though they are still much more likely than Independents or Democrats to be employed. 44% of Americans see a conflict between economic growth and environmental protection and 47% say global warming is caused by long-term planetary trends, not human activity.   By a ratio greater than 2/1 most Americans say the legislation (Cap and Trade) now in the Senate will hurt the economy. Most voters think the news media make global warming appear worse than it is. Despite Al Gore sharing a Nobel Prize because of his stance on global warming with the UN IPCC, only 31% of Americans believe Al Gore is an expert on the topic and only 29% rank the UN as “an ally of the United States”; while 15% consider the UN our enemy; and 47% see the UN as somewhere in between.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Lies on Deficit, Obamacare, Bankrupting Individual States

                According to New York Times best-selling** author Martin L. Gross, Barak Obama just lied about $500 Billion in deficits and Obama’s soaring national debt is leading the country toward “absolute destruction.” Gross, who has testified before congress six times and authored the new book “National Suicide: How Washington is Destroying the American Dream from A to Z,” is a social scientist and an expert on government inefficiency.

                Obama recently began a move to raise the national debt once again and said that this year’s deficit spending was less than $1.4 TRillion. Mr. Gross said, however, that Mr. Obama is “a master of deceit” and the real figure is actually $1.88 TRillion or roughly half a TRillion dollars more and almost a 35% greater amount. Gross said that Obama deliberately failed to mention that $500 Billion was also spent from the trust funds (money supposedly set aside for things like Social Security, Medicare, etc.) which they “satisfy” with an IOU that is never paid and which goes directly to raising the national debt. Mr. Gross said any journalist who was interested could have discovered the same thing just by contacting the Bureau of the Public Debt at the Treasury Department. “But,” he said, “the mainstream media is not interested in challenging Mr. Obama.”

                Gross said that the president was not alone in his deceit, that the congress and the mainstream media are all contributing to the soaring national debt in one way or another. The New York Times puts Obama’s number ($1.4 TRillion) in headlines and “no one thinks to question it.” Our ballooning debt, according to Gross must be reined in and soon or “it will eventually destroy us.”

                “How they do it is that they NEVER count the set-asides, the money they spend from the trust funds, just give Social Security a worthless IOU. They lie continuously.” Because of this practice, Medicare, Social Security and the national part of Medicaid are now totalling $100 TRillion in debt and obligations. Read that again, ‘Medicare, Social Security and the national part of Medicaid are now totalling $100 TRillion in debt and obligations’ which the congress and president never mention.  Medicare was supposed to only cost $12 Billion a year over its first 25 years from 1965 to 1990 – but it really cost $109 Billion yearly and they also had this huge addition to the national debt because both parties, but especially the liberal Democrats, cheat and lie just exactly as Mr. Obama just did by reaching into the trust funds and putting IOUs in there and NO MONEY HAS EVER BEEN ACTUALLY SET ASIDE.

                So-called Obamacare Healthcare “Reform” will devastate the already troubled federal government’s finances. “But the worst part,” according to Gross is that beside costing $2 TRillion, Obamacare will bankrupt the individual states. The states are presently $200 Billion in the hole, according to Gross, but Obamacare after a few years will be paid 43% by the individual states. “When that happens, property taxes will skyrocket.” Gross said that this sneaky way of hitting the states was a direct attack on the country’s middle class. “He promised he wouldn’t hurt the middle class, but this will ruin them, this will be a major tax on the middle class.” He also said “Mr. Obama will” as part of the Obamacare law if it passes “take $1 TRillion out of Medicare and when that happens people will die.” 

                Gross returned to the theme of debt destroying the country: “the Soviet Union was never invaded, it imploded because of their debt, because of their poor economy, and now our own federal government is the lead player in destroying our economy. We got into this through insane spending,” he emphasized. “We’re going to spend ourselves into oblivion, and someone has to stop it.”

                From Rajjpuut’s point of view the scariest portion of all this is the fact that the individual states will all go bankrupt. This is the UNITED States.  Fifty of them used to have a lot of say in how the country operated, that is likely to disappear totally if the disaster Mr. Gross mentions occurs. Destroying the individual states and putting them at the financial mercy of the central government will dramatically quicken all measures to move the country toward a single totalitarian socialist entity.

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut
 
** the NY Times' motto is "all the news that's fit to print," but Rajjpuut thinks the only consistently true part of the NY Times is the non-fiction best-seller lists dominated about 12/1 by Conservative authors like Martin Gross.  In recent months the TIMES has managed somehow to leave out the Van Jones incident, the speech where Mao was called someone's hero, Climate Gate, ACORN's willing abetment of illegal activities including underage prostitution by illegal aliens, ACORN's dumpster dumping, Climate Gate and this story right here.  By willfully accepting as true every word from Barak Obama's lips . . . it's apparent the Times' motto should be modified to:  "all the left-wing propaganda you can stomach."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567Next »