Posted by
Rajjpuut's Folly on Monday, November 16, 2009 4:36:16 AM
“Hell,” it’s said “has now fury like a woman scorned!” Actually, the fury of “True Believers" scorned” makes women’s fury look like the friendliest of banter. True Believers on the right, a.k.a. ultra-conservatives and religious fundamentalists; and True Believers on the left, ultra-liberals and Marxist and anarchist radicals are among the worst excuses for human beings on the planet.
Everyone knows of the danger from right-wing groups like the KKK and skin-head factions and people like Timothy McVeigh; and of course most recently Nidal Malik Hasan a radical Islamist/Jihadist . . . and you see what kind of destruction and misery these sort of right-wingers are all capable of creating. Well in Rajjpuut’s not-so-humble opinion, True Believers on the left are even more dangerous. For one thing they tend to be far more educated and far more convinced therefore that they are absolutely RIGHT in their True Belief. But mostly they are so dangerous because they tend to be capable of extremely subtle attacks that no one takes nearly seriously enough . . . .
In the past sixteen years since the first WTC attacks, we’ve seen numerous horrific examples of Islamist extremists inflicting terroristic attacks on humanity. The first large-scale LEFT-wing attack that Rajjpuut remembers from his youth was in 1975. Largely through the efforts of three True Believing Leftists, New York City went bankrupt*** that year. How does that rank compared to all the Muslim deaths since? Well, at first glance it’s like comparing apples to oranges . . . but is it really?
In this country there’s a very sorry state of affairs where the cheap, low-life crook is considered far more dangerous, in general, than the white-collar criminal. The white-collar criminals, the Martha Stewarts and the Bernie Madoffs of the world, are capable of far more havoc and able to ruin far more lives, but until recently, if caught they’d tend to spend their ultra-short penal time under relatively posh conditions. Now white-collar criminals undoubtedly come from all across the political spectrum and there’s good reason to believe that the right-wing produces more than its share . . . but like white-collar criminals, left-wing True Believers are capable of very subtle and sophisticated attacks on the system as well as plain old grubby bombs, bullets and political corruption. The biggest shock to me was the first time I saw Left-wing intolerance. Talk about bile! You understand, of course, that the left professes to be the most understanding, absolutely most tolerant and most supportive people on the planet. Well, these noble proponents of diversity and tolerance and equality (not equality of opportunity, but equality of everything else including equality of possession of your money and property) are without a doubt among the most hateful and intolerant people on God’s earth. Rajjpuut believes the technical term is “Sanctimonious Ca-ca heads” hee hee.
One obvious case in point is the Obama administration's undisguised attempts to dismantle the authority of the U.S. Constitution; the free market system; the nation's financial underpinnings and everything traditional and strong and good about the country itself. Just as Cloward and Piven conspired to and succeeded in bankrupting New York City in 1975 (see footnote below); Obama is conspiring to use specious "emergencies" to transform the nation into a fully Marxist state . . . several earlier blogs fully document these accusations. Talk about your potential for wreaking havoc subtlely . . . .
A second case in point, since they lost their latest attempt to sanctify the concept of gay marriage in Maine, the liberal community and specifically the liberal homosexual community (95% of the gay populace?) has become so outraged that they’ve taken to threatening mayhem of all sorts against specific and random targets. Of course, like Hasan should have been treated, every single instance needs to be reported and followed up on, some menacers are, thank God, pure cowards hiding behind internet anonymity. But others are truly dangerous. Here’s perhaps the most well-written one of about 12-15 articles, blogs, comments on the issue of gay threats, menacing, vandalism, mischief and real violence:
http://710knus.townhall.com/columnists/MattBarber/2009/11/13/gay_jihad
Just so he can also earn the scorn of violent “homosexual activists,” Rajjpuut reminds his readers: what’s right is ZERO INtolerance toward homosexuals as citizens or human beings; TOTAL INtolerance for the STATED GOALS of the national homosexual organizations and their most quoted leaders and most well-known magazines. As my many earlier blogs have documented: Obama’s “School Security” appointee Kevin James and the homosexual activist he most “admires” (his words) and the most well-known homosexual magazines all have expressed a desire for removing the “age of consent” completely. That’s clearly wrong. However, even if that never happens, but if gay marriage is sanctified by law, then the day when homosexual adoption occurs is not long in coming. And pederasty of any sort as advocated by the most radical elements of the homosexual movement canNOT be tolerated. See the footnotes to understand the logic behind this apparently huge leap in logic. ^^^
Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,
***How it happened was it was really, little more than an “intellectual exercise,” a university parlor game.” In ’66, two ultra-LEFT-wing political science professors, Richard Cloward and Frances Piven from Columbia University, in New York City, decided there was a bit of a problem with “dialectic materialism” and that waiting for history to unfold perfectly according to Lenin and Marx was just too “iffy” . . . so human beings needed to intervene in order to speed this highly desirable process along. Their “Cloward^^^-Piven Theory “or “Cloward-Piven Strategy” suggested doing exactly that: creating crises in capitalistic free markets and in non-socialist governments to bankrupt them, befuddle them and bring them to their knees: in their own words, “bringing on political change by orchestrating crisis.”
The political change he and she first got heavily into began when they contracted with African American militant George Alvin Wiley and helped him found the NWRO (National Welfare Rights Organization to put their strategy to bankrupt the welfare system into action and thus, they assumed, hasten some truly radical change. The trio assumed that the forthcoming economic collapse would bring revolution to all the streets in the land as political and economic turmoil consumed the nation. It worked.
Sort of . . . .
LEFTists today “credit” (their word) Wiley’s organization and Cloward-Piven Strategy for creating the conditions that led to the “Welfare Crisis” and the eventual 1975 bankruptcy of New York City. Of course, it didn’t really work on the huge national scale they figured it would impact, and just got a lot of conservatives and other responsible people very mad. So every time Obama and the LEFTies like Pelosi, and Frank and Reid make another bumbling and irresponsible move, don’t assume they’re idiots or crazy. Crazy like a demented fox? Perhaps?
^^^***1. Nambla.org (North American man-boy love association) is one of the more outspoken voices for the “homosexual agenda”
2. The title of a book that Obama School Security appointee Kevin Jones wrote the forward for is "The Queering of Elementary Education.” Rajjpuut believes that until the 6th grade all families should be trusted to instill sex education in their children and no primary or elementary child should be exposed to Jenning’s “curriculum” which he states must cover “gay and bi-sexual and transsexual” issues in EVERY course.”
3. Jennings himself has made a big deal about reminding homosexuals to employ “euphemisms” such as safety, security, etc. to get what they want legislatively. However, he has also been personally involved in teaching 13-year olds about the delights of a homosexual activity known as “fisting.” The great pederast he worships is Harry Hay. NAMBLA and Hay both consistently oppose ALL “age of consent” legislation.
4. Harry Hay (in a 1983 address) said, “. . . if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know . . . that relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen- and fifteen year old kids need more than anything else in the world.”
5. Homosexual relationships between consenting adults is, therefore, the business and only the business of those consenting adults. Homosexual marriage because IF it is allowed it will lead unerringly to legal adoption must never be allowed since pederasty is such a dangerous part of the most vocal of the homosexual activist cadre.